I have never been fond of the American aphorism, "My country, right or wrong." On the surface, it suggests a reflexive, unbending and blind loyalty to and pride in one's nation, no matter its shortcomings. This can lead to all sorts of excesses, as U.S. history so amply demonstrates. However, love of and pride in a person's country of birth is, or can be, quite a different thing.
I've been thinking about national pride in light of what Charlie Angus recently had to say. He reminds us of how that pride informed our past politicians, whether in government or opposition, in their relationship with the Americans. While that relationship has mostly been cordial, it has never been servile.
Now comes word of a new poll by Angus Reid that shows a steep decline in national pride.
In 1985, 78 per cent said they were “very proud” to be Canadian. This dropped to 52 per cent in 2016 and now by another 18 points to 34 per cent. The proportion who say they are either proud or very proud of their nationality has dropped precipitously from 79 per cent to 58 per cent over the past eight years.
The Star's Kevin Jiang offers some analysis:
These numbers could indicate Canadians feel the country isn’t living up to their expectations, Ramos said, especially in the years after the COVID-19 pandemic.
“You don’t have to look very far across the Toronto Star headlines to see that there are issues around stagnant wages, around affordability, around housing,” [political sociologist Howard] Ramos said. “This is a big part of what’s being observed in this trend.”
As well, there are key demographic differences.
Older Canadians were significantly more likely to feel deeply attached to Canada, with 63 per cent of men and 66 per cent of women over 55 echoing that sentiment. In contrast, just 39 per cent of men and 26 per cent of women aged 18 to 34 answered the same.
Political party affiliation also plays a role.
Conservative voters were most likely to want to see the country split up or take up Donald Trump’s offer to become the 51st state; 11 per cent of Conservative supporters said they want to join the U.S. while eight per cent said they’d prefer to “see the country split up into two or more smaller countries.”
There can be little doubt that disaffection is widespread, for the above stated economic reasons, as well as things like wait times for medical service, etc. As well, I can't help but wonder about the effect of right-wing podcasters on Canadians' views, especially younger ones, of our country.
Is there a way of reversing this trend? Obviously, politicians are in key positions to influence our national vies. The constant harping about the brokenness of Canada by opportunists like PP certainly contribute to the negative sentiments, a view echoed by Richard Nimijean, a Carleton University professor:
“National identity is not static,” Nimijean said. “If things are tough all over and if our leaders are talking about things being bad ... it’s not surprising we get these kinds of results.”
But Ramos believes these results may also indicate the country is in need of a clearer definition of what it means to be Canadian. He points to a 2015 interview with the New York Times, where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said there was “no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.”
“Maybe it’s time for us to begin to think about what is that identity,” Ramos said, “and what we should be proud of.”
And that, of course, is a topic fit for any number of blog posts, but perhaps it is time for a refresher course on our country and why it is so dear.
I shall end now by wearing my heart on my sleeve, something I am usually loathe to do. There is no other country on earth I would rather be a citizen of. It was this country into which I was born and have been nurtured, and it will have my undivided (but not uncritical) loyalty until my days are done.
Pierre Poilievre's constant castigation of being Canadian has done much harm to our country.
ReplyDeleteAdd a little Daniele Smith and the wound is a self inflicted one!
Today BC commemorated the passing of Premier John Horgan who despite his faults displayed a profound pride in being a Canadian first and a BC'er second.
Why do we allow ourselves to be ruled, directed and influenced by so many politicians and celebrities that are driven by ego , faith and greed ?
TB
Your question is a good one, TB, for which I have no good answer. the older I get, the more puzzled I am by the actions of my fellow humans.
Delete.. I’ve nothing but furious & extremely informed intent - to reveal - attack & humiliate those embracing daily incremental Cognitive Assault via ‘MEDIA upon the PERCEPTIONS of Canadians & citizens of other Nations
ReplyDelete.. this whether for ‘political profit or malevolence is an Inherent - Insidious & Divisive Strategy of Coordinated Propaganda 🦎
Point well-taken, Sal. However, don't forget to include the pollsters who, I've long believed, have an outsized influence on those perceptions. Nonetheless, the poll does give one some food for thought, and it, along with the Charlie Angus speech, really got me thinking.
Delete