Showing posts with label canada-u.s. relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canada-u.s. relations. Show all posts

Friday, February 7, 2025

Two Things Proud Canadians Can Do


As I wrote in my previous post, there are very heartening signs of a deep resurgence in Canadian national pride. Consumer boycotts of American products, the purchasing of Canadian products and the booing of American national anthems are burt three signs of this growing fervour.

But in some ways, those actions are merely the low-hanging fruit. To be truly and deeply patriot, we need more than loud and flagrant gestures. We need both knowledge and democratic participation.

Americans are great at the superficial - mouthing nonsensical and reflexive statements like, "My country, right or wrong," comes easily to those who would rather react that participate meaningfully in their society. Talk, as the saying goes, is cheap. but in the American example we see the high price to be paid for substituting loud braying for quiet contemplation: the likes of Donald Trump and his marauders who are systematically dismantling the laws, customs and traditions of American government. Consider the following, especially how easily the always glib Speaker of the House Mike Johnson turns legislative authority into a Trump rubber stamp and a virtue:

I won't waste my time or yours in analysing his discourse, but one can imagine that the timbre of his voice and the 'conviction' with which he speaks would convince the majority of his listeners that an American takeover of Gaza would find favour with the entire world.

So if we are truly patriotic Canadians, how do we inoculate ourselves against a plague of pervasive, low-level thinking while at the same time bolstering Canadian products? I would suggest a subscription to a reputable Canadian newspaper. While I know many are rightfully dubious of the MSM, they still offer our best hope for informative reporting, reporting that is crucial to a healthy, functioning democracy. We have national papers like The Toronto Star and The Globe and Mail, both of which have some excellent columnists. Both papers have digital editions that are reasonably priced, and both, ahem, are Canadian products.  For an international perspective, I highly recommend The Guardian which, I believe, still requires no subscription.

The knowledge gained by reading widely cannot be underestimated, and the power conferred can be immense. Which brings me to my next and final point. If we indeed want to be proud and powerful Canadians, we need to vote. While our voices may not carry the day, a strong presence at the ballot box sends a strong message to our would-be leaders: we are present and engaged, and we are watching. 

There are two pending elections. In Ontario, voters will go to the polls to elect a provincial government on February 27. Only apathy and ignorance will allow the majority return of the grossly incompetent Doug Ford regime. And federally, it is likely we will be voting in early Spring. Will we allow ourselves to be bamboozled by the aphoristic and shallow PP, or will be we demand something more?

An uncertain future awaits us. As proud Canadians, we have a number of roads ahead of us. The routes we choose will have an immediate and lasting impact on all of us.




Saturday, January 11, 2025

Some Refreshing Candour


Whatever you may think of Jean Chretien's political legacy, one thing to remember is that he charted his own course. That was made abundantly clear when he refused to join George Bush's "coalition of the willing" to invade Iraq all those years ago, something Stephen Harper said he would have willingly joined.

On his 91st birthday, Chretien has penned an essay in The Globe and Mail that is both refreshing and a much-needed antidote to some ot the efforts that have been made to thus far appease the avarice and imperialist aspirations of the incoming felon-president-elect, Donald Trump.

While acknowledging that those efforts have  had some value, at least in terms of stressing the costs to both countries of tariffs, Chretien writes of the need for what he calls a 2025 Plan B:

Let’s tell Mr. Trump that we too have border issues with the United States. Canada has tough gun control legislation, but illegal guns are pouring in from the U.S. We need to tell him that we expect the United States to act to reduce the number of guns crossing into Canada.

We also want to protect the Arctic. But the United States refuses to recognize the Northwest Passage, insisting that it is an international waterway, even though it flows through the Canadian Arctic as Canadian waters. We need the United States to recognize the Northwest Passage as being Canadian waters.

We need to be stronger. There are more trade barriers between provinces than between Canada and the United States. Let’s launch a national project to get rid of those barriers! And let’s strengthen the ties that bind this vast nation together through projects such as real national energy grid.

We also have to understand that Mr. Trump isn’t just threatening us; he’s also targeting a growing list of other countries, as well as the European Union itself, and he is just getting started. Canada should quickly convene a meeting of the leaders of Denmark, Panama, Mexico, as well as with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, to formulate a plan for fighting back these threats.

Every time that Mr. Trump opens his mouth, he creates new allies for all of us. So let’s get organized! To fight back against a big, powerful bully, you need strength in numbers.

Chretien also calls out the corrosive spirit that has infected Canadian politics to the point where we are making ourselves even more vulnerable to international predations:

The current and future generations of political leaders should remember they are not each other’s enemies – they are opponents. Nobody ever loved the cut-and-thrust of politics more than me, but I always understood that each of us was trying to make a positive contribution to make our community or country a better place.

That spirit is more important now than ever, as we address this new challenge. Our leaders should keep that in mind.

I'll close with Chretien's parting words, which seem particularly apt in these turbulent and troubled times:

 I am 91 today and blessed with good health. I am ready at the ramparts to help defend the independence of our country as I have done all my life.

Vive le Canada!

 

Sunday, December 15, 2024

Time For A Refresher Course


I have never been fond of the American aphorism, "My country, right or wrong." On the surface, it suggests a reflexive, unbending and blind loyalty to and pride in one's nation, no matter its shortcomings. This can lead to all sorts of excesses, as U.S. history so amply demonstrates. However, love of and pride in a person's country of birth is, or can be, quite a different thing.

I've been thinking about national pride in light of what Charlie Angus recently had to say. He reminds us of how that pride informed our past politicians, whether in government or opposition, in their relationship with the Americans. While that relationship has mostly been cordial, it has never been servile.

Now comes word of a new poll by Angus Reid that shows a steep decline in national pride.

In 1985, 78 per cent said they were “very proud” to be Canadian. This dropped to 52 per cent in 2016 and now by another 18 points to 34 per cent. The proportion who say they are either proud or very proud of their nationality has dropped precipitously from 79 per cent to 58 per cent over the past eight years.

The Star's Kevin Jiang offers some analysis: 

These numbers could indicate Canadians feel the country isn’t living up to their expectations, Ramos said, especially in the years after the COVID-19 pandemic.

“You don’t have to look very far across the Toronto Star headlines to see that there are issues around stagnant wages, around affordability, around housing,” [political sociologist Howard] Ramos said. “This is a big part of what’s being observed in this trend.”

As well, there are key demographic differences. 

Older Canadians were significantly more likely to feel deeply attached to Canada, with 63 per cent of men and 66 per cent of women over 55 echoing that sentiment. In contrast, just 39 per cent of men and 26 per cent of women aged 18 to 34 answered the same.

Political party affiliation also plays a role.

Conservative voters were most likely to want to see the country split up or take up Donald Trump’s offer to become the 51st state; 11 per cent of Conservative supporters said they want to join the U.S. while eight per cent said they’d prefer to “see the country split up into two or more smaller countries.”

There can be little doubt that disaffection is widespread, for the above stated economic reasons, as well as things like wait times for medical service, etc. As well, I can't help but wonder about the effect of right-wing podcasters on Canadians' views, especially younger ones, of our country. 

Is there a way of reversing this trend? Obviously, politicians are in key positions to influence our national vies. The constant harping about the brokenness of Canada by opportunists like PP certainly contribute to the negative sentiments, a view echoed by Richard Nimijean, a Carleton University professor:

“National identity is not static,” Nimijean said. “If things are tough all over and if our leaders are talking about things being bad ... it’s not surprising we get these kinds of results.”

But Ramos believes these results may also indicate the country is in need of a clearer definition of what it means to be Canadian. He points to a 2015 interview with the New York Times, where Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said there was “no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.”

“Maybe it’s time for us to begin to think about what is that identity,” Ramos said, “and what we should be proud of.”

And that, of course, is a topic fit for any number of blog posts, but perhaps it is time for a refresher course on our country and why it is so dear.

I shall end now by wearing my heart on my sleeve, something I am usually loathe to do. There is no other country on earth I would rather be a citizen of. It was this country into which I was born and have been nurtured, and it will have my undivided (but not uncritical) loyalty until my days are done.