I chose the above as my graphic because I am so often these days thinking of the absurdity of political theatre - you know, the type that happens when government tries to convince the electorate that it is serious about flexing its muscle in the face of corporate power. Such enactments are designed to divert our attention away from the fact that corporations control our governments.
The theatre currently on offer is called Standing Up To The Tech Giants. The scenario goes like this: the Canadian government, in order to protect our sovereignty and our democracy, is demanding that Meta and Google pay news organizations for the content showcased by their respective algorithms. Thanks to the resistance put up by both entities, the government is pulling ads from Meta and Instagram, which are now refusing to carry Canadian news on their sites; Google will face similar consequences when it stops showcasing Canadian news. Personally, it means nothing to me that those two will no longer be sites where I can find links to news; I read several newspapers, one print and two digital, because I abhor living in ignorance or a restricted worldview.
Is the Canadian response a blow struck in defence of democracy and sovereignty? Maybe, but our leaders lack any real appetite to tackle the corporations that exert even more influence/control over our lives. One example, of which I have previously written, is the Rogers-Shaw merger. Despite the protracted spectacle of that theatre, the merger was, as I always knew it would be, ultimately granted. The fact that the feds want to protect and cosset such a cellphone quasi-monopoly is reflected in the fact that they refuse to allow foreign competition into the field.
And what about the toothless Parliamentary inquiry into grocery prices in Canada? You know, the one where executives thumbed their noses at our representatives.
The sorriest part of the Competition Bureau’s just-released market report on grocery competition in Canada is not its obvious conclusion — we need more competition in the sector — but the lack of disclosure reported by the grocery giants.
We recall the parliamentary hearings this past spring when MPs pushed grocery executives for granular financial data on food profits, essential to validating, or disputing, the “greedflation” charge levelled against retailers as grocery prices rose and rose and rose.
And we recall the high degree of corporate pushback from executives appearing before those hearings who declined to air their profit margins, specifically on food, in the public realm.
Now we know that despite promised confidentiality from the Competition Bureau, co-operation from the industry was mixed. To quote the report: “In many instances, the bureau was not able to obtain complete and precise financial data, despite its repeated requests.”
The government's answer is not to create legislation that would compel disclosure, nor will it entertain the NDP's suggestion about taxing grocers' windfall profits. No, its response is that we need more competition. How that can be achieved is not included in the current theatrical run.
The other response is to subsidize the grocers' excessive profits by sending out rebate checks that will do nothing to tame corporate greed but perhaps score a few political points for the governing Liberals. But even that attempt seems to be falling flat:
If you watched the entire clip, you will have noticed the corporate world's best Canadian friend, Justin Trudeau, blaming the high cost of food on the pandemic, the war in Ukraine, etc. Nary a word about corporate greed, that omission exactly what his friends in high places like and encourage.
