Monday, August 18, 2025

NEW UPDATE: Is This The Solution?


I continue to be befuddled by the fact that airlines can mandate unpaid work for its flight attendants. A check of the Canadian Labour Code shed no light, as it would seem the only ones excluded from the payment are interns, who are not considered employees under the code.

The answer would seem to be to legislate whatever changes are necessary to eliminate this gross inequity. And if you clicked on the link in my previous post, you will know that David Climenhaga is advocating such. And given the attendants' adamant refusal to go back to work, despite a Canadian Industrial Relations Board order to do so, immediate action is required.

Let's be honest here. The Carney-led Liberal government has no one but itself to blame for the imbroglio. In a CBC report dated August 13, before the strike, 

flight attendants from a number of carriers have been calling on the federal government to make changes to the Canada Labour Code to address unpaid work.

"It's not a huge ask, really. All people are asking for is to be paid for their time on the job," CUPE spokesperson Hugh Pouliot told CBC News.

"It's a very problematic situation, not just for Air Canada flight attendants, but flight attendants across the board."

And I suspect that last sentence represents one of the sticking points for the government. As I wrote in the past many times, under Justin' Trudeau's leadership, there was nary a corporate entity the Liberals didn't love. If the same holds true of its current leadership, they will be loathe to do what must be done to end the dispute: promise to pass legislation as soon as Parliament resumes that will rectify the egregious exploitation of labour currently practised by all Canadian airlines, i.e., corporate entities, and make it retroactive to the time they return to work. Such a good-faith gesture, I think, would be well-received by the union, the CUPE leadership and, most importantly, the Canadian public, which strongly supports the attendants' cause. 

For their part, a majority of Canadians are calling on the airline to pay up before the planes tilt up and compensate service crew for the full breadth of their flight duties.
We also have to remember something.
Both the Conservatives and NDP introduced bills last parliamentary session that would have changed the Labour Code to ensure flight attendants are paid for pre- and post-flight duties. But both bills died when the House was dissolved earlier this year.

 Pouliot said it's encouraging to see opposition parties supporting the changes, but said it's "tragic and confounding" that the Liberals haven't backed the move.

"I think you would be looking at a fundamentally different situation at Air Canada right now if the Liberals — a year and a half ago — had decided to play ball with the other parties," he said.

However, there is evidence to suggest the government isn't that keen on ending airlines' modern slave practices. Again, before the strike actually began, 

When asked by CBC News, a spokesperson from Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu's office didn't comment on whether the Liberals would support changes to the Labour Code to address flight attendants' concerns. But they encouraged Air Canada and CUPE to reach an agreement.

The damage to the government's reputation cannot be minimized, especially given that the other parties see the present situation as iniquitous. 

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Conservative labour critic Kyle Seeback wrote a letter to Hajdu last week calling for the Liberals to make the Labour Code changes.

"No other federally regulated worker would accept being on the job without being paid and neither should flight attendants. It's time to end this outdated and unfair practice," their letter reads.

Speaking to reporters Wednesday, Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner reiterated her party's stance.

"As somebody who is a frequent flyer, I think they should be paid for [pre- and post-flight duties]," Rempel Garner told reporters on Parliament Hill.

"I hope that the union and management can come to an agreement on this, but certainly the principles that were contained in that bill last year are things we stand behind as a party."

Unless the Liberal government wants to continue to be schooled by the Conservatives and condemned by both the air attendants and the flying public, they must act with dispatch. 

UDATE: Is this the amateur hour? Is this really the best the Liberals can do here? Is it an admission of gross ministerial incompetence? Was Hadju absent from the last session of Parliament when two parties introduced bills to change the Labour Code? Or is it just another example of the contempt government has for the people it 'serves'?

 
Patti Hadju is planning to investigate allegations of unpaid work? Lord, save us from these duplicitous, benighted fools!

LATEST UPDATE: It appears, after negotiating throughout the night, that a tentative deal has been struck.

CUPE, which represents more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, said that after nine hours of talks with the assistance of the chief mediator appointed by the federal government, the deal struck will be presented to its membership, who will have an opportunity to ratify it.

Among the sticking points for the union was the issue of pay for work performed while planes are on the ground. While not elaborating on the issue, the union said in a statement provided to CBC News that "unpaid work is over." 

 

11 comments:

  1. I am increasingly disappointed with Prime Minister Carney.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hadju wins this week's award for best ministerial baffle-gab.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I failed to save the link but somewhere this morning there was an interview with Michael Rousseau, Air Canada's President explaining some of the chaos resulting from the strike and Air Canada's failure to adequately prepare for the possibility of a service int eruption. He said (I think I have this almost exactly) "We expected a back to work order".

    This is an epic fail.

    One is left wondering if he was extrapolating based on the rail strike and lost year's port workers strikes in BC and Montréal or if the fix was in with the minister Patty Hajdu.

    Judging from this article by Dale Smith and the X video of Hadju he links to, I'd vote for a fix. /Minister shocked at decades-old endemic problem

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the link, Anon. I'll bookmark the site. I did see a brief segment with Rousseau on yesterday's news, and his succinct comment to the union, "Obey the law," supports your contention that the expectation from the beginning was government intervention. I do hope this marks a turning point. I do think the spectre of greater labour involvement (perhaps the threat of a general strike) had a bracing effect on the government and its overlords.

      Delete
    2. "I do think the spectre of greater labour involvement (perhaps the threat of a general strike) had a bracing effect on the government and its overlords."

      I was not considering that. I was just thinking that Air Canada had panicked but it may have been an ukase from the PMO. The faster they can bury this the better. We don't want other major unions getting ideas.

      Delete
    3. Well, the genie is out of the bottle now. I'm sure others in the labour movement will take good note, Anon.

      Delete
    4. Here is a brief excerpt from a Star piece I just read that suggests the labour movement was following this very, very closely, Anon:

      Bea Bruske, president of the Canadian Labour Congress, said union leaders are outraged that Section 107 was used in the Air Canada dispute and want to see it removed.

      “This is a line in the concrete,” Bruske said. “I’ve never seen the labour movement this angry and this united at one moment in time.”

      Labour leaders argue that by forcing workers back to work, the government threatens everyone’s right to strike and sends a message to employers that they don’t need to negotiate. Some are calling for the law to be changed to remove Section 107.

      Delete
  4. Aha, found the link I was looking for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMY7c0RVR4M @ 2:27
    It's pretty clear Rousseou does not understand contingency planning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the link, Anon. Rousseau sounds like he is the aggrieved party here, eh?

      Delete