Thursday, September 21, 2023

What Happened In Vegas

 ... didn't stay in Vegas. Consequently, another one bites the dust. Dean Blundell explains all:


The corruption obviously runs deep, and it runs from the top down. Doug the Slug is holding another news conference this afternoon. Given how deep the premier is in to the developers, expect only the usual misdirections, pontifications, evasions, self-serving justifications and NO reversal on the Greenbelt crime.

In other words, ANYTHING BUT THE TRUTH.

9 comments:

  1. Wow! Thank you for re-posting this. I had no idea about the amount of land available for development in the area he has called the white belt.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You're welcome, Anon. There seems to be many things that the Ford cabal doesn't want us to know.

      Delete
    2. Will send you a link, Lorne..
      A short true tale from Vegas..
      & ‘something that left Vegas’ with me

      Many of my ‘memoir stylings’
      as well as my Short Fiction
      include Serendipity and/or Happenstance

      What could befall or ensnare Ford
      or Poilievre, Danielle Smith.. hell ! Anyone ?
      Well.. .. at least 4 ‘solid marriages’ rest solely
      on street rep of - ‘my lips are sealed’

      The Moral of the Story .. Lorne ?
      You tell me.. I often wonder about this stuff

      (will send as separate comment..) 🦎🏴‍☠️

      Delete
    3. Thanks, Sal. I got really busy today and haven't yet had the chance to read it.

      Delete
  2. https://thomasdarcyodonnell.substack.com/p/what-happened-in-vegas. 🦎🏴‍☠️

    ReplyDelete
  3. Do I detect a hint of regret here?


    https://www.nationalnewswatch.com/2023/09/21/insufficient-grounds-for-full-probe-into-ford-stag-and-doe-commissioner/


    Ontario's integrity commissioner said Thursday there are "insufficient grounds" for him to conduct a full investigation into a stag-and-doe event for Premier Doug Ford's daughter, though he noted an "interesting" finding about ticket sales for the gathering.

    I have explained previously the 'reasonable and probable grounds' threshold that the (Members' Integrity) Act requires for me to commence an inquiry," he wrote.

    "It is a higher bar than many members of the public and many members realize, requiring more than having a 'reasonable suspicion.'"

    ReplyDelete
  4. thanks for the link, Anon. It would perhaps have been helpful if the integrity commissioner laid out plainly the criteria he uses, given that 'reasonable and probable' don't seem to cut it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think the commissioner was viewing this as as a follow-up to his earlier report on Clark (Report Re Minister Clark - August 30, 2023.pdf) where he sets out what the legislation authorizes him to do. See Pg. 8 Legal Framework of the Inquiry. It is a bit annoying.
    john

    ReplyDelete