To say that our current Covid-19 global crisis is causing us to rethink many things is to state the obvious. Far and wide, people are coming to new understanding about their priorities, their values, and their attitudes toward others.
Suddenly, that spa treatment isn't so urgent; the coveted new outfit can wait; maybe the precariously-employed should have more stability and remuneration. That it takes a near-apocalyptic event to bring about such introspective cogitation likely reveals a great deal about our shortcomings as a species.
We have always mouthed platitudes about our essential workers, but now our appreciation of them feels more genuine, whether we are talking about medical personnel, grocery store workers, sanitation workers or mail carriers. But are we willing to go the distance for them when this catastrophe finally wanes?
History provides a mixed answer, according to history professor Walter Scheidel. The Black Death, caused by rat fleas carrying bubonic plague, started in the fall of 1347 and, over the next century and a half, (periodic flareups being the pattern,) likely killed one-third of Europe's people.
And it upended the socio-economic order, despite the old guard trying tenaciously to keep things as they had been for a very long time.
The wealthy found some of these changes alarming. In the words of an anonymous English chronicler, “Such a shortage of laborers ensued that the humble turned up their noses at employment, and could scarcely be persuaded to serve the eminent for triple wages.” Influential employers, such as large landowners, lobbied the English crown to pass the Ordinance of Laborers, which informed workers that they were “obliged to accept the employment offered” for the same measly wages as before.Consequently, the worker finally caught a break, and a certain leveling occurred:
But as successive waves of plague shrunk the work force, hired hands and tenants “took no notice of the king’s command,” as the Augustinian clergyman Henry Knighton complained. “If anyone wanted to hire them he had to submit to their demands, for either his fruit and standing corn would be lost or he had to pander to the arrogance and greed of the workers.”
... wealth inequality in most of these places plummeted. In England, workers ate and drank better than they did before the plague and even wore fancy furs that used to be reserved for their betters. At the same time, higher wages and lower rents squeezed landlords, many of whom failed to hold on to their inherited privilege. Before long, there were fewer lords and knights, endowed with smaller fortunes, than there had been when the plague first struck.But a worker's paradise was by no means established. While there were some successes, there also were many disappointments:
During the Great Rising of England’s peasants in 1381, workers demanded, among other things, the right to freely negotiate labor contracts. Nobles and their armed levies put down the revolt by force, in an attempt to coerce people to defer to the old order. But the last vestiges of feudal obligations soon faded. Workers could hold out for better wages, and landlords and employers broke ranks with each other to compete for scarce labor.In the end, true change proved elusive:
Elsewhere, however, repression carried the day. In late medieval Eastern Europe, from Prussia and Poland to Russia, nobles colluded to impose serfdom on their peasantries to lock down a depleted labor force. This altered the long-term economic outcomes for the entire region: Free labor and thriving cities drove modernization in western Europe, but in the eastern periphery, development fell behind.
When population numbers recovered ... wages slid downward and elites were firmly back in control. ... In most European societies, disparities in income and wealth rose for four centuries all the way up to the eve of World War I. It was only then that a new great wave of catastrophic upheavals undermined the established order, and economic inequality dropped to lows not witnessed since the Black Death, if not the fall of the Roman Empire.There are obvious parallels to be found in today's world. Employers such as Loblaw, Metro, Shoppers Drug Mart, Dollarama and Walmart have retroactively boosted the wages of their front-line employees, people bravely performing necessary work. Even banks are getting into the act, with the Royal Bank offering a $50 per day bonus for onsite workers who earn less than $65,000 per year. Notably, however, these boosts are temporary.
Clearly, there are lessons for all of us during this pandemic. Unlike earlier times, we have a much wider grasp of the world and our place in it. We have immense power to shape the future for the betterment of all that previous generations did not. If we elect to fall back into the patterns of the past, we will have made an informed choice, but it will be one that reveals much about our character as contemporary citizens of the world and as a species.
Decision time is here.
There is little doubt in my mind Lorne that many of those who have been raking in good money but spending it as fast as it comes in will be lining up at the government trough along with those whose monthly stipend barely puts food on the table after paying rent to said fat cats. We can but hope that this shake up evens things up a little but I do wonder exactly who will eventually be paying for all the 'support' . Me cynical? Never!
ReplyDeleteYour guardedness is well-founded, Rural. I share it.
DeleteThe CBC has a report that chronologically itemizes the trail of quarter-measures and half-measures the federal government so reluctantly introduced as the pandemic swept the country. When you go through it and see it in context it reveals a succession of events in which "the economy" defeated the public interest. And it was that reluctance to defend the public that let this virus win the early rounds, putting us ever further behind. Measures that could have been implemented in January waited until March. Mr. Trudeau's timid approach to the Emergencies Act is a telling example.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/covid-19-canada-federal-response-1.5529263
Thanks, as always, for the links you provide, Mound. The CBC story makes for some very interesting reading; even in the early stages of this pandemic, I was struck by the lackadaisical screening taking place at Pearson. the country's largest airport. As Covid-19's serious nature became more apparent, I had some friends returning from Portugal, as well as a brother-in-law and his wife returning from Spain whose screening remained at the same perfunctory level. As I recall, they weren't even checking arrivals' temperatures, surely a most egregious omission.
Delete