I disagree with Rick on this one. The computer systems used by most Canadians are riddled with security holes. The potential to subvert the vote by electronic means is therefore great. And the robo-call Harperites would certainly have no ethical issues about subverting an electronic vote.
The simple act of voting using a pencil and a piece of paper is still the most secure way to vote. We have to get young people interested in exercising their democratic rights, even if it doesn't involve a smartphone or tablet.
I think secure electronic voting will be possible in the future, but not today.
Without a foolproof security protocol (if such a thing exists), I agree that the arguments against online voting are strong. But I wonder, and here I profess my ignorance, if any studies have been conducted and technologies explored that would make it viable, Anon.
"Without a foolproof security protocol....". In my opinion there are no foolproof security protocols at the moment. There are organisations and corporations that work towards that goal, but I think the revelations of Mr. Snowden have cast a pall on any claims of 'foolproof security'.
So, in the meantime, pencil and paper, Lorne, pencil and paper.
Paper and pencil work fine for me, Anon; I just wish it weren't such an apparent impediment for so many others who choose not to venture out on election day.
I disagree with Rick on this one. The computer systems used by most Canadians are riddled with security holes. The potential to subvert the vote by electronic means is therefore great. And the robo-call Harperites would certainly have no ethical issues about subverting an electronic vote.
ReplyDeleteThe simple act of voting using a pencil and a piece of paper is still the most secure way to vote. We have to get young people interested in exercising their democratic rights, even if it doesn't involve a smartphone or tablet.
I think secure electronic voting will be possible in the future, but not today.
Without a foolproof security protocol (if such a thing exists), I agree that the arguments against online voting are strong. But I wonder, and here I profess my ignorance, if any studies have been conducted and technologies explored that would make it viable, Anon.
Delete"Without a foolproof security protocol....". In my opinion there are no foolproof security protocols at the moment. There are organisations and corporations that work towards that goal, but I think the revelations of Mr. Snowden have cast a pall on any claims of 'foolproof security'.
DeleteSo, in the meantime, pencil and paper, Lorne, pencil and paper.
Paper and pencil work fine for me, Anon; I just wish it weren't such an apparent impediment for so many others who choose not to venture out on election day.
DeleteI hate to take a flame thrower to anyone's hobby horse, but electronic voting is simply not ready for prime time.
Delete