...because Forcillo “substantially followed his training,” which was provided by the state.Even more upsetting is the reaction of the police union, which you will see in a moment. But first, I'd like you to take a look at a clip about an execution perpetrated by the Cleveland police three years ago; especially offensive is the reaction of their union which, as you will see in the second clip, has some eerie echoes of Toronto police union head Mike McCormack's comments on Forcillo's conviction.
“The state,” he said, “should be disentitled to a conviction because they . . . provided the training to him.”
MsCormick laments that it sends a chilling message to front-line officers, as well it should. Unfortunately, the real message they will refuse to process is that when they violate their oath to serve and protect, they will be held accountable by the state, however imperfectly.
Humility, not police outrage, would be the proper reaction in both the Cleveland and Toronto cases.

