Recently, I finished reading a book called The Failed Promise: Reconstruction, Frederick Douglass, and the Impeachment of Andrew Johnson, by Robert Levine. The American Civil War and its aftermath are topics I find of great interest, not just because of their long-lasting impact on American society, but also because those echoes of history continue to reverberate today.
As vice-president, Andrew Johnson succeeded to the presidency upon the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. Although he showed initial promise in the struggle for Black rights, (indeed, he fancied himself as "the Moses of the Black people") he turned out to be a raging racist who hid his myriad prejudices behind rhetoric that suggested he was concerned about moving too quickly on things like Black citizenship and Black male enfranchisement lest it lead to racial strife and danger for the Black people,
Johnson revealed his nature in many ways, including how he pandered to Southern fears that enfranchisement of Black males would dilute the voice of white people, making them a 'minority'.
A pity we don't know history better, because if we did, we would know that Johnson's rhetoric was merely an early version of the Great Replacement Theory, the idea that immigrants are changing the complexion of Western nations, supplanting 'old stock citizens' and thereby disempowering them in pursuit of a political agenda. You may or may not be surprised that it also has some traction in Canada.
If you read David Climenhaga's post, you will know that Alberta premier Danielle Smith recently dined and chatted onstage with Tucker Carlson, the erstwhile Fox 'commentator' who was let go because he criticized his bosses. He found open-arms in Ms. Smith, however, pictured below with a couple of other attendees you might recognize:
It was at this gathering that Carlson, knowing he had a receptive audience, vented his spleen, as discussed by Shree Paradkhar:
"They're taking away your voting power by changing the population of your country, but nobody's talking about that," he said. "Canada has the highest immigration rate in the world per capita. ... If you change the population of the country, you change the country. And you dilute the voting power of the people who are vested in that country who have lived there long term. Who understand the history and culture of the country. All of a sudden, their vote means much less."
There are certainly rational discussions one can have about immigration levels, as Paradkhar points out. However, there will be be those Canadians who see the world only in black and white, absolutist terms. They of untutored minds, limited education and a paucity of critical thinking skills will lend a credulous ear to the likes of Carlson's racist nonsense, and without doubt will feel he is speaking their 'truth'.
And others are listening as well.
Immigration is emerging as a top issue in the 2024 U.S. elections. Donald Trump, who in 2016 so charmingly called Mexican immigrants rapists and said "they're bringing crime," has now upped his toxicity to say immigrants "are poisoning the blood of our country."
In Germany, the far-right Alternative für Deutschland expanded its base in recent regional elections, riding on the fear sparked in German voters by the sudden burst of asylum-seekers.
But as Paradkhar points out, theymiss the poimt that immigration is necessary.
If Carlson had only spoken to Ontario Premier Doug Ford, he would have learnt in 2021 that there was a labour shortage and that "We’re in such desperate need of people from around the world."
But rationality is rarely appreciated, and thus the endless cycle of history prevails.
UPDATE: Michael de Adder captures Tucker rather nicely, don't you think?
Peterson, Smith, Carlson, & Black. Give them horses, scythes, maybe a robo, and they are off.
ReplyDeleteI do find Carlson interesting at times as he will interview people whom the mainstream press have pronounced anathema. For example, he had a quite decent interview a few weeks ago with Viktor Orbán in Budapest. Orbán may have a few, cough faults but he is a major player in the EU and a minor but important player in NATO. I may have missed it, but has the CBC or MSNBC interviewed him? NO? I expect they would flee if someone suggested they do so.
Back when he was still with Faux News he often had interesting guests on that one would never see on any of the other mainstream English media. My guess was that they were there so Fox News could put the boot into the Democratic Party but at least they were there.
It's like a remark I heard from ???, well somebody, who was asked why he was on RT, the Russian channel. His reply, "Well, no one else asks me".
BTY, have you seen much coverage in the Canadian media on the International Court of Justice's preliminary hearing on South Africa's accusation of genocide in Gaza?
I have never watched Carlson except for the odd bit posted elsewhere, Anon. Apparently he did start out as a serious journalist before bartering his soul away. Perhaps there are echoes of that journalist in the interviews you refer to.
DeleteI know the Star has given some coverage of the ICJ, but to be honest, I have not read it, as it is a foregone conclusion that any finding will be ignored by Israel., given that it is led by a man whose sole goal is self-preservation.
I have never watched Carlson except for the odd bit posted elsewhere
DeleteSame here, so I probably have not seen him at his worst.
Re the ICJ, Israel started screeming about 10 seconds after the decision. I was listening to some commentators and apparently if the final decision goes against Israel, it can have some nasty effects at the UN level. I was quit surprised.