Saturday, October 15, 2022

Perhaps This Is Part Of The Answer


My wife, who is far from being the cynic of the family (that would be me), often concludes that humanity is a failed experiment. It is not an assessment with which I disagree.

I often find myself pondering why and how we have reached our current perilous, likely terminal, state. While there are many obvious factors, perhaps one of the biggest is that there are far too many people today. Beyond the physical pressures that our population puts on our planet, there is a breakdown of any sense of community with the larger world. Perhaps in earlier times, hunters and gatherers found it much easier to feel a kinship and responsibility for each other. Even today, we behave toward our immediate community, family and friends, far differently than we do with those with whom we have no immediate connection.

And with that loss of connection comes increasingly selfish behaviour, and self-regard often becomes our default position. If Covid has taught us nothing else, it is that large numbers put their personal freedom and comfort over the safety of others. Hence the outrage over mask mandates, vaccinations, etc. The same, I suspect, is reflected in our attitudes toward climate-change mitigation. While some can see the larger picture, others can only see the cost of gas, carbon taxes, etc. that elicit reflexive, often violent, reactions.

There is a letter in today's Star that got me thinking about the above. It expresses a perspective that succinctly puts all of us in our place.

Microbes may have swarmed Mars, Oct. 11

So French scientists have concluded that Mars may have harboured an underground world teeming with microscopic organisms …. Sadly, they say, these microbes may have themselves altered the atmosphere and triggered a Martian ice age, leading to their demise. These French scientists have further concluded that simple life like microbes might actually commonly cause their own demise.

I look at what is going on in our world today: climate change caused by humans; senseless destruction caused by the Putins of the world; the toxic environment created by politicians like Trump, Poilievre, Smith et al.

My non-scientific conclusion is that humans are no smarter than single-celled microscopic organisms.

 Patrick Stewart, Toronto


8 comments:

  1. In his book Sapiens; Yuval Noah Harari reaches the same 'we are screwed' conclusion.
    It's still a good read; a kind of I told you so with detail!!

    TB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, TB. I've heard of the book but never read it.

      Delete
  2. I agree with TB. Sapiens is a good read. There are at least three existential challenges facing mankind. Any of these three can bring down our global civilization. We're losing ground on all three which means they're becoming ever more intractible even as our collective resolve to meet them fades.

    I tried, ineffectively, to chronicle our passage but I have lost the heart to continue. Why, what for? In November the UN will stage COP27, the 27th global climate summit - in Cairo, of course. This one is being billed as the sequel to the 2015 Paris summit. And, after nearly three decades of lofty intentions, where are we?

    Nature will sort this out, eventually, but on its terms, not ours. We have forfeit our options to ride this out humanely. I have reached the point of resignation. - MoS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had a sense of your discouragement in the absence of any recent posts, Mound. I know exactly how you feel. We, as a species, seem hellbent on our own destruction.

      Delete
  3. I understand Mound's resignation. It's deeply depressing to see us go on our merry way, unconcerned about future generations. I'm afraid Mark Twain got it right. We are "the damn'd human race."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Twain saw us as we are, Owen, not as we pretend to be.

      Delete
  4. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/13/the-uninsurables-how-storms-and-rising-seas-are-making-coastlines-unlivable?fbclid=IwAR17cu1D73FyB1_U-AhiCDegDWCQsxdqTHPzNogDfdxIuNrMFjb1UOQ2I1Y

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the link, Mound, which makes for very interesting reading. It is all well and good for people to exhibit a spirit of resilience in the face of climate-caused disaster, but that resilience devolves into folly when they insist upon rebuilding in areas of high risk. It would also be folly, in my view, for Canada to offer support to insurance companies to continue coverage for those foolish enough to want to stay after disaster has struck.

      Delete