I have to admit to deep ambivalence in hearing the news that Team Trudeau jetted off to Mar a Lago to have dinner with the incoming American president. My mental images included exaggerated genuflection, followed by a kissing of Don Trump's ring. Sometimes hyperbole helps clarify my thinking. Not so much this time, however.
On the one hand, my sense of national pride is deeply hurt at the thought of our prime minister and his entourage jumping to the beat of a madman. On the other hand, I wonder how much choice we really have in the matter, well aware that the consequences of the visit, both good and bad, may be long lasting.
Some are applauding the pilgrimage.
“I’m surprised and impressed,” said Flavio Volpe, head of Canada’s Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, that the Canadian leader was meeting with the president-elect, adding that kind of personal facetime with the former and future president is invaluable for Trudeau, and for Canada in the months ahead.
“The PM is demonstrating the humility that’s required (by) going to the source. Also the prime minister is demonstrating to the contrary of all the predictions (the idea) that Donald Trump wouldn’t want to work with him is untrue.”
Others, however, are not as sanguine. Of our country's snap-to-it reaction to Trump's threat of tarifffs, Bruce Arthur writes:
Canada’s reaction, though, showed a country ripe for the picking, smelling of panic and surrender. There are facts, of course. The two borders are incredibly different; barely any fentanyl is caught coming from Canada to the U.S., though it’s rising slightly. The same is true of irregular crossings, on a border than spans nearly 9,000 kilometres.
Still, many Canadian politicians didn’t just accept Trump’s bark-at-the-waiter framing, but hopped to attention, ready to serve. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, predictably, put out a statement asking Trump to exclude oil from tariffs, and pledged to send extra patrols to the Alberta border, which is, uh, not a hotspot. One supposes she is already familiar with the crossing at Coutts.
A similar reaction came from Quebec premier Francois Legualt as he called for increased border security, and Ontario's Doug Ford even
met with Canada Border Services Agency and the U.S.‘s Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to find out “what needs to happen to secure our border.”
Of PP's response I will not speak, except to say that from his perspective, it can all be blamed on Trudeau's incompetence, a refrain that must be growing tiresome to even his most ardent supporters.
As well, there are darker implications to the visit.
[Timothy]Snyder’s first rule of tyrants is simple: do not obey in advance, and too many seem ready to forget that rule, in a vulnerable country.
I have to admit to deep ambivalence in hearing the news that Team Trudeau jetted off to Mar a Lago to have dinner with the incoming American president.
ReplyDeleteI don't. It is disgusting. He should have slapped back at that orange face immediately. See President Sheinbaum's response "Mexican President Claps Back at Trump Over Tariffs". She has some guts. Trudeau? His father is spinning in his grave.
I suppose Justin could be just waiting for the USA to wreak itself but I am not impressed.
Justin could have just suggested that these tariffs might mean Canada bans the export of oil, steel, aluminum and electricity to the USA. Or just puts a 100% export tax on them.
I hope, if things escalate, Team Trudeau has plans for strong retaliation, Anon. I'm not at all confident that will happen, however.
DeleteThe problem with threatening to ban exports of oil, alternaters , electricity etc. into the US is that iscwhat Trump wants. He thinks that tariffs will raise prices to American consumers who will the buy only American stuff. Economists, business people and Trudeau know it won't work so why do his work for him.
ReplyDeleteAn excellent point, Anon. I thought the letter-writer's suggestion a tad extreme, but I like the underlying idea that we not simply roll over and play nice with the tyrant.
Delete@ The other Anonymous :)
DeleteThat might be what Trump wants but he is not all that smart. There is such things as lead-times.
I really don't know but my guess, assuming the USA even if it has bauxite reserves, would need 3–5 years to organize bauxite mining and the construction of an aluminum refinery. I'm assuming something close to an emergency all-out effort.
The same timeframe likely applies for electricity generation though the US might be able to re-commission some old coal-fired generating stations.
From what I am reading it is not just building XXX. To some extent, the USA has de-industrialized to the point that it lacks the basic infrastructure and trained manpower to do a lot of building and it could take a goneration or more to rebuild', assuming the US has the determination to do so.
As the song goes it's that nail that was key.
For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
For want of a shoe the horse was lost.
For want of a horse the rider was lost.
For want of a rider the message was lost.
For want of a message the battle was lost.
For want of a battle the kingdom was lost.
And all for the want of a horseshoe nail.
All things are connected, Anon, a fact that many in the U.S,. seem unable or unwilling to grasp.
DeleteYour post captures how many of us feel about Trudeau bending the knee. Trump understands weakness better than almost anyone. He knows how to exploit those he can dominate.
ReplyDeleteHi Mound. Hope you are well. I can only say that I hope we do not see repeat performances of servility in the future, but my sense is that with some, appeasement efforts never end.
DeleteTrump is on a roll'
ReplyDeleteNow he threatens the BRICS nations not to undermine the US dollar.
So far the UK and EU have refused to bend a knee and PM in waiting Poilievre is mute ,particularly since he has not had an invite Whitehouse south.
TB
I imagine that the worst aspects (not sure there were any good ones) of manifest destiny will manifest themselves under Trump and his many courtiers, TB. As for Poilievre, increasingly he looks unfit to lead us anywhere good.
DeleteFWIW
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/media/2024/dec/02/brain-rot-oxford-word-of-the-year-2024
TB
Thanks, TB. And they used to tell us that watching too much TV was bad for us. Seems kind of quaint today, eh?
DeleteBrain rot is a good description of todays voter and the world we find ourselves in!
Deletei wonder if we entered the world of AI before we realised it?
To be sure modern day decisions are being made with a very different outlook upon life than they were pre social media ?
I don't think George Orwell would have envisaged todays world?
TB
I agree, TB. Even Orwell would be shocked by what we have become, I think.
Delete