To really understand the mindset of educational institutions today, you have to appreciate one fact: despite nonstop rhetoric to the contrary, they are inherently conservative and risk-averse. Some might even call them reactionary.
While I will get to the main basis for my post in a moment, a personal anecdote perhaps helps to illustrate this pernicious reality. Yesterday, I was talking to a neighbour across the street who retired from high-school teaching last November. A graduation ceremony was recently held in the school's parking lot for teachers, students and their parents, but she was told by a superintendent not to attend, as she is no longer a staff member. The administrator feared that "some parents might complain."
While it has been true for some years that administrators and boards have become hypersensitive to public opinion, the trend has accelerated, in my view, because teachers who advance beyond the classroom today tend to be what a friend calls "the resume-polishers," desperate to prove that they are "team players" as they climb the career ladder.
Simply put, their personal ambitions trump educational principles. They follow orders without question, and do everything in their power to avoid 'dirt' in their package.
And that is not good for society.
Shree Paradkar illustrates this fact as she writes about the craven treatment of Javier Davila by the Toronto District School Board:
Last month, after the equity educator was repeatedly attacked by a Toronto Sun columnist, and a pro-Israel advocacy group called for him to be fired, the Toronto District School Board placed him under investigation and an indefinite suspension. The action ignited an uproar from teachers, principals and other staff who framed it as an “all lives matter” approach by the board that has put a question mark on its stated commitment to anti-oppression.
Davila declined to comment to the Star. But in a Medium blog where he describes his work, he said he has received hundreds of emails over the years from teachers, principals and even directors of other school boards who asked permission to use his resources.
An educator for 16 years, Davila's job in part consists of sharing resources on matters including anti-colonialism, anti-racism and police abolition.
In recent months, he has sent bulletins on topics such as the Land Back movement, anti-Semitism, the Holocaust, and responses to the murder of Asian sex workers in Atlanta.
The board was so enthusiastic about his work that it directed people to his website if they weekly communications from him.
All that enthusiasm suddenly evaporated after the latest violence between Israel and the Palestinians.
Davila shared two resources for teachers, one on May 16, the other on May 19.
Within days, a Toronto Sun columnist wrote not one or two but three pugilistic columns castigating Davila for being anti-Israeli.
Indeed, much of the Jewish community is in an uproar. B'nai Brith is calling both for a full apology from the board and the termination of Davila, adding that "... no one who distributes anti-Semitic propaganda like this should work for a school board in Canada.”
All of which has board officials quaking in their collective boots.
“During this time, the staff member will be on home assignment. We are also in the process of removing this staff member’s current and previous group mailings/newsletters from TDSB email inboxes,” a spokesperson told media.
“Home assignment” means being put on ice, cut off from his workplace and not allowed to contact his colleagues.
The board also took down the page on its website that directed educators to Davila’s newsletter.
So how are people reacting to this?
Retired TDSB educator Tim McCaskell says where formerly this might have earned a low-key talking to,
"... the board is so risk-averse now it doesn’t take much to send it into a tailspin,” he said.
The Israeli lobby’s position was that criticizing Israel could foster anti-Semitism. Today it posits that criticizing Israel is anti-Semitism. “The conceptual framework has shifted,” he said. “Could you imagine organizing a conference on human rights in Palestine?”
Others are rallying in support of Davila:
There are no instances of anti-Semitic content within the resources,” reads a petition titled “Oppression and Censorship have no place in our schools.” It is signed by nearly 5,000 people and includes the support of unions such as CUPE and CUPW.
A group of more than 80 teachers calling themselves “concerned educators” and identified only by their initials and the name of their schools told the school board and trustees they were perturbed by the term “anti-Israel racism,” saying it would have the same effect of shutting down conversations on anti-oppression as would labelling critiques of Canada’s treatment of Indigenous people as “anti-Canadian.”Jewish educators, parents and community members began another petition in support of Davila. “The resources that Mr. Davila shared were in no way anti-Semitic, and we’re concerned that this investigation will put a chill on TDSB staff who may fear discussing this issue or possibly other issues that are perceived as controversial,” they wrote. “As Jewish parents, we refuse the notion that Palestinian human rights are somehow oppositional to our own — in fact, the opposite is true.”
Meanwhile, the board is engaged in a surveillance protocol that would do justice to a police state.
… staff said their social media accounts were being monitored and “likes” on pro-Palestinian material meant a private conversation with immediate superiors.
“We are increasingly disturbed by the policing, criticism and silencing that some of us are experiencing when we name and create space to discuss such human rights violations,” a group of about 50 TDSB principals told the board in an open letter they signed as “anonymous for fear of reprisals.”
A school principal who was one of the letter writers confirmed to the Star they were given a talking-to by a senior board official as well as a trustee of a ward that is neither from where the principal works nor lives.
All of this leaves me angry and disgusted, but not surprised, for the reason I cited at the beginning of this post. But the final word goes to an anonymous TDSB staffer:
“People are nervous,” said the TDSB staffer. “For a lot of educators looking at Javier, we’re thinking if this is a white-passing dude who is being targeted this way, imagine if it was us.
“All of us are very afraid.”
There are many people afraid to express their opinion on many things these days. I see women concerned with losing sex-based rights, protection of womens place in sports, even having difficulty even getting the federal government to DEFINE what they consider women to be, so the goal posts are clear - being accused of hate speech for asking, where does the idea of self-id leave us? https://quillette.com/2021/06/24/standing-up-to-the-gender-ideologues-a-quillette-editorial/ It seems that it is easier to say, "I'm offended" than look at a situation and ask, is this fair? equitable? How will these attitudes and changes play out in the long run? Nope, just asking the question gets you branded as a -phobe of some sort, or -ist of another sort. It is extremely chilling.
ReplyDeleteWe live in a fraught world, 131220, where some people like to embrace a cause, not because they intend to do anything about a situation, but because it is the flavour of the day. They fear deviating from what is dictated to by social media and various groups. The costs of not being entirely onside with an issue are too much for many to bear. Some of the concern may be justified, but only because, in my view, we live in a very polarized, bifurcated world where things are deemed either right or wrong. The mature thinker surely knows they are always shades of gray, nuances that cannot be ignored.
DeleteOne quick example that comes to mind is the desire to take down statues of people like Sir John A. and Egerton Ryerson, architects of the residential school system. While what they did, and the intentions behind their actions were vile, I don't agree with the taking down of their statues; one has to learn from history, not forget it, so the far better solution, in my view and as suggested by others, is to erect additional plaques and information to look at such evil alongside of their accomplishments.
Thanks for the link. I shall read it with interest.
This is a profoundly disturbing post, Lorne. Orwell would recognize this craven cowering. Is this what civil society has become? Secondary schools, from my experience, never were crucibles of free thought and radical expression but nor were they this tightly monitored, surveilled.
ReplyDeleteI thought teachers had unions to push back against this sort of excess. Where are they?
Where are they indeed, Mound. I hope their apparent lack of reaction is only an omission of reporting and not a conscious decision. I can tell you from the latter days of my teaching that at the local level, when something occurred that seemed a violation of members' rights, we were often told that administration was simply exercising 'management rights'. That being said, years ago I found myself in a conflict with the administration, and one of the union execs did a very good job representing me.
DeleteThe other thought that arises from your question is the fact that it is not uncommon for local union presidents and vice-presidents to later move into administration. Not burning bridges would be an important priority for those seeking such elevation.
Your experience mirrors mine, Lorne. Those who rose kept a lid on things. Boat rockers did not rise.
ReplyDeleteOh, the tales we could tell, Owen.
Delete