Monday, February 25, 2019

A Cowardly Silence



Human nature is a strange, wondrous, and sometimes shameful thing. For every Nelson Mandela who takes a stand against arbitrary authority, there are countless millions who will simply go along to get along. If an edict, no matter how obviously wrong or unethical, is issued in the name of authority, it is usually obeyed.

"I was just following orders" is a refrain that echoes throughout modern history.

An egregious example of such is surely to be found in this story from Ontario.
The provincial government quietly ordered autism service providers last September to stop admitting new children for therapy and to keep parents in the dark about the move, documents obtained by the Star reveal.

Internal documents — from the Ministry of Children, Community and Social Services and senior administrators of nine regional service providers — state that the 23,000-child wait-list for autism therapy was closed because of “financial pressures.”
While the Ontario government, led by Doug Ford, and Lisa MacLeod, his Children’s Minister, deny any wrongdoing, memos obtained by The Star paint a totally different picture:
The documents obtained by the Star reveal that the waiting list for therapy has been closed for five months unbeknownst to parents. And while therapists could have been seeing new children during that time, they were instead ordered to spend their extra time elsewhere.
And autism service providers were asked to be complicit in this deception:
A Sept. 27 email to staff from a senior administrator at one service provider states: “As of this afternoon, we have been asked to ‘pause’ on making calls to families (on the wait-list) … We have been assured that this is very short term, and as soon as we get more information from the ministry on how to proceed we will share it.”

Another email to staff from a service provider the following month reveals how the ministry wanted inquiries from parents to be handled: “Note that the ministry has asked us not to stray outside of their messaging (e.g. we would not tell families directly that there will be no service offers…”
And the reason for this immoral obfuscation boils down to politics. One therapist, speaking anonymously for fear of reprisal,
... argued that there are far fewer than 23,000 children on the waiting list. But by freezing the list, the government has allowed the numbers to grow in an attempt to justify its changes...
Those changes include hard caps and severe reductions in funding for each family with an autistic child, changes that have provoked a firestorm of protest at Queens Park.

My point, however, is how readily autism service-providers complied with this government order of secrecy, while at the same time knowing they could be helping more children:
In an interview, one therapist said that she and her co-workers could have been helping new children on the wait-list all this time.

“There was capacity. We did have space on our caseload to pick up children from the wait list but we couldn’t,” said the therapist who spoke on the condition of anonymity because she was not authorized to give media interviews.
And yet they said nothing. Indeed, were it not for the investigative efforts of The Star, this sordid story would never have come to light.

To a one, autism therapists should be deeply and thoroughly ashamed of their collective silence. There can be no excuse for such craven collaboration.

6 comments:

  1. Each day, Lorne, my fury at the Ford government -- and those who collaborate with it -- grows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are in good company with that sentiment, Owen.

      Delete
  2. If they didn't go along, they would have been put out of business. The blame goes squarely on Ford group.

    UU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The administrators of these therapists might have believed that, UU, but there certainly was absolutely nothing to stop the therapists themselves who received these directions from their bosses to leak them anonymously to the press.

      Delete
  3. How did governments seemingly at once become so perverse and so incompetent? How did the electorate get so dumbed down as to support these elected reprobates?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've have to take those questions as rhetorical, Mound. One cannot help but wonder, however, whether cause and effect is at work here to some extent.

      Delete