Thursday, October 2, 2025

Stating The Obvious


From my perspective, it is clear that America has become a fascist country. Those who deny that reality are either extreme partisans (I refuse to use the term patriots, the word fascists favour) or living in a world of massive denial. 

The militarization of American cities, an essential precondition of fascism, has been going on for some time. Just look at the tanks and the army paraphernalia many police forces now sport - certainly a reflection of their relationship with their citizens. What is striking, however, is how quickly and unabashedly the Trump regime is moving in establishing a siege mentality, another precondition for fascist rule. There has been the stationing of military presences in Los Angeles, D.C., Memphis, and Portland, with deployment plans for other Democratic cities as well. There is the constant denigration of Democrats as "far-left radicals' and antifa acolytes. Additionally, Trump, in his recent address to the military in Quantico, referred to "the enemy within." In other words, American citizens have become the enemy, and he went further and suggested the Pentagon use American cities as “training grounds” for its troops.  

For those with the audacity to still think independently, the irony of the entire situation cannot be lost. Masquerading as the law and order regime pursuing the 'enemy', another favourite fascist ploy, Trump and his jackboots are in fact violating a myriad of laws. Justin Ling writes:

Off the coast of Venezuela, the enemy was four unarmed fishing boats. The White House declared them cartel members and terrorists — for which they supplied no evidence — and ordered drone strikes to kill everyone onboard. 

This extrajudicial killing could constitute a war crime. 

Pete Hegseth, the former Fox personality and now Secretary of War, 

says there will be “no more politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement.”

Those rules of engagement are designed to comply with international law — to avoid the murder of civilians, to prevent torture, to forbid the use of weapons of mass destruction. More importantly, the rules of engagement are part of strong set of internal rules that allow officers and soldiers alike to refuse illegal orders. 

Those rules are being flagrantly violated.

Those rules of engagement, and the U.S. constitution, forbid the military from policing the streets of America in peacetime. And yet active-duty personnel have been deployed to American cities, with more occupations to come. Trump says he’ll authorize “full force” to quell the enemy at home. The U.S. military, arguably the nation’s most fiercely independent institution, looks set to obey. 

In the new fascist Amerika, enemies are ubiquitous.

Trump has classified antifa — the mere concept of anti-fascist activism, not an actual group — a terror organization. He has ordered the Department of Justice to go after former FBI Director James Comey and Congressman Adam Schiff.

Given the ongoing threats against Venezuela and Greenland, Ling believes it is past time for Canada to take the fascist threat seriously through careful preparation.

It means revising agreements and cancelling memoranda of understanding. It means not sending our Canadian Armed Forces to train with units who no longer feel bound to the Geneva Convention and marking intelligence ‘for Canadian eyes only’ because it could be used to commit war crimes. It will mean creating systems within NATO that operate separately from Hegseth’s new warrior corps. This will invoke Trump’s ire, no doubt, but history teaches us that appeasing despots rarely works out.

But more is needed. 

[T]here will come a point where we need to make our objections clear, and where we will need to rally our allies into speaking up as well. Trump’s adventurism in South America will be a direct security challenge to Canada. His new affinity for committing war crimes will implicate the Canadian Armed Forces, who serve shoulder-to-shoulder with the U.S. military on many fronts. His comfort to fellow autocrats and despots will be a direct threat to the countries still pursuing democracy.

The greatest advantage Trump and his lieutenants currently hold is people's stubborn belief that fascism is impossible in the U.S.A. It has already arrived, and the sooner that fact is widely acknowledged, the better the chances of excising that malignancy from the body politic.  

 

20 comments:

  1. Trump and Hegseth tried to 'put in place' US generals and admirals; it did not work!
    These military personnel remain faithful to the US constitution and not the president.
    There is hope yet!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These military personnel remain faithful to the US constitution and not the president.

      We cat only hope. I expect a goodly number will objert but that a fairly large number will obey Trump/Hegseth. This could get nasty very quickly.

      Abu Ghraib, casual assassinations by drone seemingly everywhere in the Middle East, and the blowing up of wedding parties in Afghanistan do not make me all that optimistic.

      People in the USA seem very tribal: Americans are human beings, the rest of humanity, meh. They may baulk at attacking/repressing/killing US citizens where a few hundred thousand casualties among the lessor breeds is of no concern. See Vietnam and Iraq as examples.

      I wonder if ICE has quick action teams to neutralize US generals and admirals as needed.

      Delete
    2. As I have said before, Anon, fancying yourself the greatest nation on earth means that all others are inferior. that tend to act with impunity, and I still remember George H.W. Bush saying, after mistakenly shooting down an Iranian passenger airliner, "The United States never apologizes."

      Delete
    3. I noticed a few years ago that Captain William C. Rogers III (Honest that's the name) who was commanding the USS Vincennes which shot down Iran Air Flight 655 retired in 1991 but I did not hear of any serious disciplinary actions against him. But he did not make admiral!

      I remember being less than impressed with the shooting down of Iran Air Flight 655 as I was flying into Dhahran Saudi Arabia three days later. Dhahran is about 40km from Vincennes' base in Manama, Bahrain.

      Delete
  2. Back in June, Bill Clinton said he wasn't sure if the country could make it until the midterms, that it would be up to the courts if they could hold fast. The interviewer was shocked, and the comments produced very limited press. I have been terribly disappointed in the Democratic leadership over the spring and summer, prattling on about bipartisanship and voting for Trump's awful nominees.
    I think/hope the Kimmel episode, the fishing boat shootings, the Quantico speech, the world reactions to Trump's tariff madness, plus Trump's mental illness have finally driven home to the Democrats that they must either lead the resistance or get out of the way of AOC and Bernie and the Democratic governors.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is no doubt the U.S. is in quite a precarious position, Cathie, and I do wonder if there will even be any further presidential elections. With a compliant Congress, what is to stop Trump from declaring some kind of national emergency/infiltration to 'postpone' elections? Although such action would be unconstitutional , so far Trump has pretty much gotten away with a myriad of violations, and the Supreme Court did rule on the scope of his presidential power some time ago.

      I agree that the Democrats need to show more spine. The first real test is the government shutdown, with some Republicans saying that many Dems are wavering. If that happens, I hold out no hope for the party. As well, AOC and Bernie are seen as threats by the Democratic gatekeepers, who much prefer a status quo to a revolution.

      Delete
  3. The USA is fucked no matter who is the governing party!
    The argument is who owns the most gold.
    The gimee party lost to the gimee more party?
    The voting public have given up on their 'democratic" vote as it becomes meaningless ( over thirty percent of US voters did not vote) and much the same can be said about Canada!
    In times like these the 'fringe' political parties make hay with the advent of Trump , Poilievre and Farage in the UK.
    Trump, Poilievre and Farage only profit because the distractions they propose offer simplistic solutions to issues they cannot control
    Will capitalism will eventually destroy itself?

    TB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All good points, TB.

      "Trump, Poilievre and Farage only profit because the distractions they propose offer simplistic solutions to issues they cannot control."

      Simplistic solutions to complex issues are well-received by a public that doesn't care to think or read widely to understand the issues.

      Delete
  4. From the web, Jonny Azkam
    Reminder: Monopoly ends when no one can afford to live on the board anymore.

    At that point, everything becomes worthless. The money means nothing. The hotels sit abandoned. The only thing left is to restart the game and do it again.

    It's unsustainable. It's what we're doing.
    8:35 AM · Jan 14, 2023
    ·
    TB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the name, TB. I had not heard of Jonny Azkam, but looked at his website. I'm afraid that his desire to wake people up is predicated on the belief that people want to do the work necessary to understand their plight. I'm not sure most are up to that challenge.

      Delete
    2. "Simplistic solutions to complex issues are well-received by a public that doesn't care to think or read widely to understand the issues."

      But to a great extent at least Trump and Farage offer something different. I think a lot of voters were/are willing to try something different because they see that what is happening now is not working. I believe we are probably seeing the same in Germany with the rise of the AfD.

      The Conservatives were doing well until Trudeau stepped down. Poilievre had the advantage he was not Justin.

      For heavens sake, Kamela Harris' platform was "Nothing is going to change".

      I cannot remember whitch Russian election it was but a Canadian election observer with years of experience as a Russian analyst in DND and DFAIT said that you could sense the challenger would win (Yeltsin maybe) because the current buffoons were so bad.

      Delete
    3. I'm not sure they offer something different so much as they challenge the conventional which, as you state, is pretty innocuous in terms of change. The status quo seems to be what the parties generally adhere to, Anon. What Trump offers is radical fascism disguised as no-nonsense common sense.Unfortunately, the common sense he is appealing is the most base aspects of the human animal.

      Delete
    4. What Trump offers is radical fascism disguised as no-nonsense common sense.Unfortunately, the common sense he is appealing is the most base aspects of the human animal.

      Oh, of course, but if you are desperate for change then why not vote for Trump or Yeltsin or Marine Lepin?

      Trump's spotty record in his first term included attempt to get out of Syria and Afghanistan.

      Compared to Genocide Joe, he may have looke like a better deal.


      Delete
    5. I'm not sure they offer something different so much as they challenge the conventional

      Perfectly sums up my thought. People are so quietly desperate that they will embrace any change. It may be totally false or evil but at the time it offers change and hope.

      Delete
    6. When people don't devote the time to really examine the issues, they wind up with people like Trump, Anon. While he may have said some things that appealed to voters, like getting out of Afghanistan, that they would overlook his essential and manifest unfitness for office is both an indictment of the Democrats and their own shallow thinking.

      Delete
  5. Well, the US Democratic National Committee is useless and corrupt like a lot of US poritical institutions but I think we have to remember that probably a majority of the population in any reasonably well-run country from ideal democracy to totalitarian à la Louis XIV (please excuse the butchered French) don't pay a lot of attention to politics if it does not affect them directly.

    Then, all of a sudden they wake up to a Hitler or Trump.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree completely, Anon, and that indeed is one of the primary weaknesses of our democracies. Unless we can recapture a concern for the collective, unified and coherent action is not possible, even in the face of grave threats. The irony is that no one is ultimately excluded in the cruelty of totalitarian states.

      Delete
  6. What Trump offers is radical fascism disguised as no-nonsense common sense.Unfortunately, the common sense he is appealing is the most base aspects of the human animal.

    I do not believe that Trump has any political inclinations.
    He originally said he was a Democrat! heavens forbid.
    Trump is in "it" for the money and recognition nothing else.
    When they said follow the money they had no idea of what they were proposing!
    Not sure who "they" were ?
    TB

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Certainly, TB, Trump sees the presidency only for the power and riches it can confer on him. Public service is not within his ken.

      Delete