Saturday, March 9, 2019

Going Off Half-Cocked



In the best of circumstances, measured, critical thinking is hard work. And as the antics of the gun lobby group the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights amply demonstrate, thinking while foaming at the mouth is well-nigh impossible.
A Toronto trauma surgeon arguing for stricter gun control is being targeted by a national firearm lobby that has flooded Ontario’s physicians’ regulator with dozens of complaints about her.

Dr. Najma Ahmed, who was on call at St. Michael’s Hospital following the Danforth mass shooting, is co-chair of an advocacy group called Canadian Doctors for Protection from Guns. The group of doctors came together in February to argue that guns are a public health issue, and to push for the passage of Bill C-71, a bill to reform Canada’s gun laws.
That the doctor has the right to express her opinion on a dire public-health threat is just too much for the gun enthusiasts:
The lobby group the Canadian Coalition for Firearm Rights last month posted a “call to action” urging members to flood the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario with complaints against Ahmed, even if they have never been her patient. The post provides a step-by-step guide on how to do this, complete with a link to the complaint form.

“I hate to say it, but stay in your lane, Doctor,” the post reads.
This extreme attempt at muting Dr. Amed's voice has thus far resulted in 70 complaints against her, complaints that must be investigated, but it is likely they will ultimately be tossed in the trash, where they clearly belong:
In a statement, Dr. Nancy Whitmore, registrar and CEO at The College, said its mandate is to focus on complaints around clinical care or professional behaviour.

“The CPSO’s role is not to resolve political disagreements when clinical care/outcomes or professional conduct is not in question. We recognize that physicians can play an important role by advocating for system-level change in a socially accountable manner,” she said.

Like all complaints, she said, the ones stemming from the gun group’s campaign are being reviewed by a committee that will determine whether they are frivolous and vexatious.
As a surgeon, Ahmed has witnessed first-hand the terrible damage bullets inflict:
Guns are “highly violent instruments that are intended to kill and maim animals and people,” she told the Star, adding she has seen the damage bullets can cause to the human body. “They act like small metal missiles, and they tear apart the organs and tissues and blood vessels and they do enormous harm.”
In the cartoon world, Yosemite Sam was depicted as a very aggressive gunslinging cowboy with a hair-trigger temper which usually resulted in a fair bit of gunplay. But in cartoons, the effects of violence and mayhem are always shortlived.

Would it were so in the real world.

6 comments:

  1. The name "Canadian coalition for firearm rights" gives it away. That's a lobby for something that doesn't exist - firearm rights.

    As a gun owner and target shooter I'm embarrassed by the attitudes of some other gun owners. Gun ownership to them is a chip on their shoulder for those who have swallowed this NRA crap. Like the rest of the civilized world, Canada has no equivalent of America's 2nd Amendment. There is no right to gun ownership. It is a regulated privilege. You must demonstrate proficiency, a working knowledge of safety measures and the regulations governing permitted use of firearms. Only then are you issued a licence for a term of years. Driving is also a privilege. Those who seek a licence must also demonstrate proficiency and knowledge and must drive as regulated. If the town builds a school, it will make that road a 30 km/hr zone and that's it. Yet we don't treat that as a threat or affront to some God-given right.

    This, however, isn't really about guns. It's about handguns and there are circumstances where an individual needs a handgun - police, armoured car crews, protective services. I don't own a handgun. I chose not to obtain that licence even though it would have been relatively easy. I have no conceivable need or even a use for a small, inaccurate firearm. Damn few of us do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well-said, Mound. Your comments certainly put this whole issue and episode into proper perspective.

      Delete
  2. "I hate to say it, but stay in your lane Doctor." Really?? Doctors are the ones who get to see the real damage that gunshots cause.They are the ones who have to figure out how to treat the gunshot wounds, some I'm sure that will stay and even disable a person for rest of their lives.

    More tragically, Doctors are the ones who get to pronounce the victim of gunshot wounds dead and the victims, in many instances are young. Dr. Najma Ahmad arguing for stricter gun control, comes from her own experience at treating victims of gunshots. She should be praised, not slandered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rabid gun lobbyists seem to dwell in a reality far removed from ours, Pamela. I don't know what they are thinking, if indeed they are thinking at all.

      Delete
  3. The crazies keep getting louder, Lorne -- but not smarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Somehow, Owen, they seem to believe that their strange hysteria should be deferred to. Apparently, recognizing rational arguments for sensible gun control is beyond their ken.

      Delete