Sunday, February 4, 2018

A Leap Of Faith?

Thus far, I have been singularly underwhelmed by the performance of federal NDP leader Jagmeet Singh. First, although a well-established Ontario MPP and deputy leader of the provincial party, he showed an unseemly timidity in refusing to seek a federal byelection seat when he had the opportunity. That decision has obviously kept him out of the House, ensuring that he is a largely unknown commodity to both the country and, to an extent, his own caucus.

I also take exception to the way he cheapened his engagement to Gurkiran Kaur by inviting a photographer from The Canadian Press and a reporter from Toronto Life to document his proposal.

Finally, there was his rush to judgement in suspending NDP MP Erin Weir from the caucus without even knowing anything about the harassment allegations against him. I guess he wanted to show he is no slouch in the #MeToo movement.

But I am willing to cut Singh some slack if he proves not to be just an opportunistic politician angling to become Justin Trudeau 2.0 The definitive test will be how he reacts to a movement that has gathered impressive momentum in both the U.S. and Great Britain: radical progressivism.

Susan Delacourt writes :
For the past two years, the Leap Manifesto has been a disruptive force within New Democratic Party politics. Now, on the eve of the federal NDP convention this month, top organizers for U.S. Democratic Sen. Bernie Sanders and British Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn are coming to town to lend the Leap movement support.

That leftist movement — led by prominent Canadian activists Naomi Klein and Avi Lewis — will stir things up whether the current NDP leader, Jagmeet Singh, likes it or not.
Supporters of Bernie Saunders in the U.S. and Jeremy Corby in the U.K, along with those from the Momentum U.K. movement believe they have common cause with The Leap Manifesto, in which Naomi Klein and Avi Lewis played pivotal roles.
The Leap Manifesto is a declaration, fewer than 1,500 words in total, calling for some sweeping policies to deal with global problems such as climate change, and income inequality. Among the recommendations are an end to all pipelines and international trade deals, as well as calls for national child care program and studies into a basic, guaranteed income.
Given the popularity of Saunders and Corbyn in their respective countries, the disastrous election of Donald Trump, and the disappointing refusal of Justin Trudeau to keep his promises, organizers are convinced the time is propitious to harness a populist left agenda. Says Sanders adviser Becky Bond:
“It really wasn’t about Bernie,” she says. “It really was about a movement of people that are really ready for big change and being able to tap into all of those people and work together to make the change, whether the politicians have it on the agenda or not.”

The ideas linking Leap, Momentum and the Sanders campaign are large ones: fighting climate change, the power of banks and corporations and income inequality.

“When I was handed the Leap Manifesto I saw that this was also happening in Canada . . . a movement of people organizing themselves, not behind a politician, but behind a set of ideas that we could fight for,” said Bond.
Such radical ideas have not found a happy home within the NDP power structure. The question we are therefore left to ponder is this: Will Jagmeet Singh rise to the occasion as the new leader and embrace this momentum, or will he, like Justin Trudeau 1.0, prove to be yet another politician bent only on securing and maintaining power?

4 comments:

  1. I make no predictions, Lorne. But I do await the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As do I, Owen. Even though my cynicism is well-entrenched, I still leave a little room for hope.

      Delete
  2. .. its a brilliant & provocative post, Lorne
    Bottom line.. 'politics' as we know it
    (which we really don't 'know it')
    has become an evolving or shaped tool
    of business or partisan interests..

    Pick any file or Ministry.. examine the reality.

    I'll pick one from off the top of my head..
    How about Veteran Affairs ?
    (I'll skip my fave for now - Environment)

    Am I delusional..
    or do we have the current government of Canada
    paying the same set of lawyers
    to tell military veterans 'to suck it up'
    be grateful.. and shove off
    as did the previous government of Canada
    who had 10 years to warm to the task..
    I cannot even repeat Trudeau's lame disclaimer
    something vague about 'we aint got enough money'
    Its Monty Python time - not Groundhog Day

    Another example ?

    How about the illustrious Rona Ambrose along with her rodeo boy, aboard a super mega yacht, deep in the sunny daze of the Caribbean, lambasting poor Justin in regard to the Agha of Khan chopper ride to mystery island.. ? Now the problem for me is not how hysterical that was.. its that the big rowboat's owner is the owner of Mt Polley mine.. you know, one of the most disastrous environmental disasters ever.. in Canada eh. So now, the BC government, recently flipped from previous fake Liberal government has missed or skipped the deadline to file charges. The real - not fake federal Liberal government which has a longer period to lay charges.. is remaining tight lipped, silent and observing from who knows where. The strangest thing is.. the damn dad did burst, toxifying everything downstream.. and they had be 'warned' the structure was failing

    Riddle me that Batman ..

    The now toxified lake downstream is/was the breeding area for 1/4 of the Chinook salmon in British Columbia.. and the home of multiple tourism sites that are now going defunct .. So? Can you spell Double Standards ? Or shared cronyism? Do all these people socialize? Is that it ? Politics as Potemkin Villages & the people waving cheerily are our elected 'public serpents'


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The incestuous nature of politics these days leaves one with little hope for change, Sal. I wonder, too, whether we are part of the problem. Have we become so conditioned to the failure of our parties that we have lost the capacity for what should be widespread outrage?

      Delete