Thursday, November 9, 2017

The Point Is



In her latest iPolitics article, Kady O'Maley offers the view that the revelations of The Paradise Papers do not constitute a scandal for Justin Trudeau and his government. And while the Scheer-led Opposition is making every predictable effort to connect non-existent dots, few are suggesting that Trudeau had any personal knowledge of the alleged offences committed by chief fundraiser Stephen Bronfman, who has stoutly denied any wrongdoing.

However, to assert Trudeau's blamelessness in all of this is to look only at the immediate situation, one that Justin undoubtedly made worse with his unseemly and ready acceptance of Bronfman's innocence, about which I posted last evening. The larger implications of the ease with which the ultra rich transfer their money to jurisdictions beyond the reach of the tax man constitute the real threat to our democracy and our way of life.

Recently, I wrote this:
The revelations now in the public arena thanks to the collective efforts of hardworking journalists reinforce a perception that many, many people have held for a long time: the tax system is gamed, and talk of tax fairness is simply convenient posturing that ultimately means nothing. This perception/reality is very damaging to public morale; those who believe in paying their taxes are now being shown that they are, in fact, the patsies for their betters.

Nothing could be worse for those who believe in a society where all of us pay to maintain a social safety net, programs to help the disadvantaged, and a public medical system where no one is turned away because their wallet is too thin. Just more fodder for the rabid right wing, and governments have no one but themselves to blame.
It is a sentiment recently echoed by Thomas Walkom:
... tax havens have proved so embarrassing that they put the entire government revenue-raising machine at risk.

The cost to Canada’s federal treasury of offshore tax havens is estimated at between $6 billion and $8 billion a year. While that may seem a lot of money, when compared to the roughly $300 billion that Ottawa pulls in each year, it is relatively small.

Most tax revenue comes from the broad middle-classes — people who are willing to pay as long as they deem the system fair. Revelations, like those in the Paradise Papers, which detail at an individual level how the wealthy and well-connected get special treatment, break that trust. This threatens the entire fiscal basis of the state.
Put succinctly, no one wants to be played for a fool. And it is that fact that makes the cossetting of the utra rich by governments so dangerous.

In its editorial today, The Star offers this:
The latest revelations from the leak of the Paradise Papers raise troubling questions, not only about government’s failure to collect what’s owed, but also about the power of money to subvert our democracy.

They serve as a reminder that those who can afford to hide income from the taxman can also afford to hire the very best lobbyists to help ensure that, whatever the public interest, governments don’t close the loopholes that allow tax avoiders to get away with it.
There is, of course, a solution to all of this, one that I am not holding my breath waiting for:
The Paradise Papers are doing nothing to soothe those who worry about the unseemly intertwining of money and power in politics or about the extent to which the economy is rigged by the few against the many. The government can do something about that. It can, for instance, close unfair and ineffective tax loopholes and collect what’s owed. Or it can sit back, defend the current arrangements and watch the cynicism grow.
It would be nice to believe that The Paradise Papers will lance the massive carbuncle of complicity that exists between government and business, but like its predecessor, The Panama Papers, it will likely last only for a few more news cycles before being replaced by a feat of political legerdemain that suggests we just move along, as there is nothing to see here.

15 comments:

  1. It's not just governments Lorne. Top CRA officials have worked closely with accounting firms ( think KPMG ) for years. In 2013 the two met to discuss ways to use offshore trusts for rich clients. Schear should know this, it was on his watch under Harper . Governments of all persuasions have regarded the free flow of money as more important then collecting taxes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a sad truth that cries out for rectification, rumleyfips.

      Delete
  2. Lorne, have you read that repugnant post Simon wrote about you today? I for one have had enough of his ageism.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I no longer read him, Anon.

      Delete
    2. I recently responded to a comment from Sal with this observation:

      Sal, I agree that our political parties are failing us. Political parties today resemble tribes that view each other as inherently evil in all things at all times. We both know a very pro-Trudeau blogger who fits that description to a T. And there's plenty of that same sort of partisan on the opposite side.

      There was a time when Canadians could disagree without believing each other an enemy of the country. Now we're herded into separate camps that view each other with anger and suspicion. How can you sustain a viable democracy that way?

      Our friend speaks regularly of "destroying" the Conservatives for all time. He wants to eradicate a party that still draws the support of almost 40% of our fellow Canadians. What fucking darkness leads a person to think that way, to say such things?

      Delete
    3. Back in the early years, the days of Liblogs, I thought that "our" side of blogging was more worthwhile than the angry vitriol I would find on the Blogging Tory side. We were able to criticize our own which was easy given we were of three camps: Liberal, New Democrat and Green.

      Now this cadre of hyper-partisan Liberals

      Delete
    4. The polarization that has infected society is worrisome, Mound. Absolutism seems to have pervaded far too much discourse, and serves nothing but division. People of our generation have a larger context upon which to draw, and understand that the Conservatives of today bear no resemblance to the party that once was respectable and capable of adding to the national debate in a constructive manner. There are likely many reasons for this deterioration, but the effect on society is widespread and destructive.

      Delete
    5. It does make one wonder, Mound, whether the vaunted progressiveness of the left is limited to tolerating only those who subscribe to group think. Other views, it would seem, are anathema. Ideologues on either end of the political spectrum can be quite intolerant, eh?

      Delete
    6. This inspired me to write a post on this subject - without, of course, mentioning names. https://the-mound-of-sound.blogspot.ca/2017/11/its-getting-hot.html

      Delete
  3. The solution is to get big money out of politics. Anyone for publicly funded elections?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That would be a good start, Owen, but I think the problem is exacerbated by the fact that far too many of our political 'leaders' identify with, or hope to hitch their wagons to, the ultra rich. Politics in many ways seems merely to have become merely an audition for lucrative post-political careers and the lavish remuneration that accompany them.

      Delete
    2. I liked Chretien/Martin solution where you paid a mandatory two bucks at the end of Page 4 of the tax return. If you were a taxfiler, rather than a "hard working taxpayer" you paid it, whether student,single mom,self employed or millionaire. Most people didn't even notice. jls

      Delete
    3. That sounds quite reasonable, jls.

      Delete
  4. By some accounts up to 10% of GDP is getting stashed in tax havens. A Guardian editorial earlier this week called those who partake in this as forming a "mobile global republic" and notes that the 1% account for 80% of the stashed cash. It accuses them of seceding from society. This is not a victimless practice for the taxes they dodge are borne by everyone else.

    I think we need a global treaty at least as broad as the OECD to enforce national laws prohibiting these tax dodges, imposing massive fines and, if need be, stripping these people of their citizenship. Rendering them stateless would deny them access to any nation they would deem suitable to locate in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree completly, Mound; the situation is grave, but the political will, both in Canada and abroad, seems to be decidedly lacking.

      Delete