Given the unhinged crowd Pierre Poilievre cultivates, it would seem that Patrick Corrigan has pierced the heart of the demagogue's mystery.
And for those who would like a graphic reminder of that crowd, there's this:
Reflections, Observations, and Analyses Pertaining to the Canadian Political Scene
Given the unhinged crowd Pierre Poilievre cultivates, it would seem that Patrick Corrigan has pierced the heart of the demagogue's mystery.
The following is self-explanatory; there is no need to watch TizzyEnt's original video posting, as the one below reveals all we need to know about the crimes, and the arrest of the woman who perpetrated them:
I applaud Peterborough mayor Diane Therrien's assessment of them. And rather than treat them with kid gloves or pander to them a la Pierre Poilievre, more political leaders need to strongly denounce them and their disruptive, illegal tactics. I want nothing to do with them.
And I will lump these people into the results of a recent Abacus poll. When asked the question, All things considered, which is a better place to live - Canada or the U.S.? 91 % of Canadians polled preferred Canada, of course, The other 9% did not.
Looking into how they answered the other questions, reveals that the plurality of younger men [those under 45] think they would be better off financially and enjoy life more if they were living in the US.
Conservative voters also tended to be less keen on Canada.
Only 60% think they have better health care than they would have in the US, and only just over a third think Canada is a better place to earn a living and enjoy life.
Those who are unvaccinated against Covid, of which the deranged are a large part, also have reservations about our home and native land.
Only half of this group think living in Canada means being safer from violence or having better health care. A plurality thinks they would be better off financially and enjoy life more living in the United States.
Now I realize that I am conflating the 9 % with the crazies, but it seems to me that they all have something in common: an unwillingness or an inability to see things as they really are. By objective standards, there really is no basis to argue that life in the U.S. is better, unless one thinks the freedom to engage in violence, to carry and use guns at will, to support insurrectionists, and elevate cult-like movements as legitimate expressions of democracy is preferable to life here at home.
In which case, all I can say is, Don't let the door hit you on your way out.
‘Just a code word for privatization,’ Aug. 18
The unconscionable and heartless directive by the Ford government to free up hospital beds by having “elderly” patients transferred to long-term care (LTC) facilities far removed from their families and communities, follows the same scheme the McGuinty-Wynne Liberals hatched, which brought the same outrage that families and others are expressing now.
The Conservatives have blatantly put ageism forward by discriminating against people of a certain age as “elderly.”
Where do those other adults waiting for nursing home placement fit into the government’s solution of clearing hospital beds?
To label those of any age waiting in hospital for accommodation in a long-term facility as “bed-blockers” shows a disturbing indifference to them.
The chaos in hospitals is not the fault of Ontario seniors, but government has shamefully placed the blame on some of our most vulnerable people.
Ellen Watson, Aurora
Privatization does not work, Aug. 12
Remember how former Premier Mike Harris “created a crisis” in education with the goal of privatizing?
Well, today Premier Ford has created a crisis in health care and, surprise, surprise, he is talking about privatization, which has already wreaked havoc in long-term-care (LTC) homes.
Ask yourself if education is any better for Mike Harris’s heavy-handed disruption tactic?
I submit that things are much worse.
If anyone thinks privatizing healthcare will make things better, look to the past, then think again!
As George Santayana once wrote, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
Jonathan O’Mara, Whitby, Ont.
Privatization does not work, Aug. 12
While I am not schooled in the intricacies of economics, it does seem to me that any model of privatization means profit, by which the provider must charge more, through extra billing, not covered by OHIP, or reduce costs, such as offering staff less money and benefits, and/or reducing the number of staff, and thereby lower the quality of service.
It only makes sense that privatization results in greater costs to the tax-payer and consumers, and less quality to those unable to pay for enhanced services.
While privatization advocates claim that fewer people will be waiting in the public system, they fail to state that a private tier would syphon off professionals (already in short supply) from the public system, contributing further to the strain on our public system.
We must maintain the integrity of our universal heath care system.
Norah Downey, Midland, Ont.
Sylvia Jones warns ‘status quo’ in Ontario health care is not sustainable, Aug. 17
It apparently was not bad enough the Ford government opted for mass institutionalization of our seniors in long-term care facilities in defiance of their stated wishes to age in place.
Now to fill empty LTC beds in the white elephants his government has funded to the tune of over $6 billion of taxpayer’s money? They plan to ship our seniors, like cattle, from one community to another so they don’t “block beds” in hospitals. Remove them from all that is familiar at the most vulnerable time in their lives to a place they don’t know, to be cared for by strangers, where it is difficult for family to visit?
In other words, abandon them after a lifetime of helping to build this province.
Could this government possibly have a more contemptuous view of older adults? Is this really what Ontario voted for?
Patricia Spindel, Ajax, Ont.
UPDATE: Let's give the final word to Brittlestar:
One of the people I follow religiously on Twitter is Caryma Sa'd. A Toronto lawyer and satirist, her online presence is largely devoted to video she shoots of the unhinged amongst us, i.e., those Canadians obviously infected by the American disease whose symptoms include uncritical acceptance of conspiracy theories popularized by groups like QAnon.
Sa'd's brilliance lies in the fact that for the most part, she merely documents their madness, letting their words and actions indict them. Because they appear so clearly foolish and deluded, it is fair to say they strongly dislike, even hate, her. Such people rarely enjoy having a mirror held up to their delusional behaviour.
The following CBC report makes use of some footage Sa'd recently shot in Peterborough, where a group went to make citizen arrests of its police force. It did not go well:
To those 57% who couldn't rouse themselves to vote in the last Ontario election, please do not make sounds of outrage over the likelihood that Doug Ford will introduce more privatization into our healthcare system. You didn't participate, so I really have little regard for your thoughts on the matter. Electoral silence, in my view, gives consent.
Sylvia Jones, our new Minister of Health, is starting to use the word innovation a great deal, which many see as code for privatization. Indeed, one can well-imagine that one of her early innovations will benefit the many private operators of long-term care facilities including, of course, the Chair of Chartwell Homes, the infamous Mike Harris.
Here is one of the brilliant ideas Ms. Jones is sharing:
Jones and Long-Term Care Minister Paul Calandra will outline a spate of “operational” reforms Thursday morning at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto.
One move, first reported by CityNews and confirmed by the Star, is to make permanent a pandemic emergency measure that allows the moving of patients in hospitals awaiting a long-term care bed to nursing homes in other communities.
Progressive Conservative sources said the decision to transport elderly people to an available bed elsewhere would be left up to doctors and could free up some 250 hospital beds by year’s end.
A bloodless solution, eh, unless you happen to be an essential caregiver to the relocated senior, likely a senior yourself.
I won't bore you with the details of how, despite the mantra that private enterprise always does things more efficiently, the private model is more a shell game than a solution; you probably already understand it is merely rearranging those deck chairs on the Titanic and ultimately confining many to the steerage section to await their doom.
I'll let the always entertaining and infinitely more witty Brittlestar speak for me.