Tuesday, June 21, 2022

The Time Is Out Of Joint

 

I spend a fair bit of time in this blog discussing my aversion to the United States. Widely populated by benighted souls, it is a country I now shun and have no intention of ever again visiting.

However, my smug convictions about the superiority of Canadians relative to our American counterparts has been shaken, for reasons that will quickly become apparent.

Martin Regg Cohn offers this disheartening news:

One in three adults in Canada believe Microsoft founder Bill Gates is either monitoring people with vax chips, or they think it’s possible, or they’re just not sure — but can’t rule it out. That leaves just 66 per cent of Canadians who reject that particular conspiracy theory outright.

According to new public opinion research by Abacus Data, it’s not just the Gates microchip, but a host of hoaxes and top secret cabals that are on the minds of Canadians — and causing them to lose their minds. A few more to blow your mind:

  • Elections, recessions and wars are controlled by small groups secretly working against us: 44 per cent agree;
  • COVID vaccines have killed many people, but there’s a coverup: 44 per cent say it’s definitely/probably/possibly true, or they’re still unsure;
  • COVID was caused by the rollout of 5G wireless technology: 26 per cent can’t rule it out.

While it would be comforting to lay the blame for these results on the way the Abacus poll was framed, a quick check reveals that respondents were simply presented with statements with which they could agree or disagree which, I believe, as polling techniques go, seems fairly innocuous. (I stand to be corrected here by those who know more about such things,)

But it has long been a quintessentially Canadian conceit that we are a more judicious and less suspicious nation, not so easily manipulated and corrupted. Not quite.

“As pollsters we often get asked, ‘Is Canada different, is Canada immune, are we somehow exceptional to our neighbours to the south?’” Abacus CEO David Coletto said in an interview.

“We felt the answer is No,” which is why his polling firm tested out these questions with a representative sample of 1,500 Canadian adults. “We’re still human beings and still susceptible to the same information at a time when we’re feeling anxious … I think we’ve come to this place.”

While I think we are all aware, thanks to the stridency of the anti-vaxxers and the Freedom Convoy occupation in Ottawa, that we have people who subscribe to destabilizing fictions, we have sometimes chosen to ignore other signs, one of which Regg Cohn reminds us:

When a trickle of “irregular” migrants started crossing our border from Vermont and upstate New York, the clamour to batten down the hatches kept rising; when a couple of boatloads of ethnic Tamil refugee claimants from Sri Lanka arrived off the coast of B.C. in 2010, a Toronto mayoral candidate named Rob Ford complained publicly that Canada didn’t need more migrants.

...an Angus Reid poll later showed a remarkable 55 per cent of Ontarians wanted those Tamil passengers deported even if found to be legitimate refugees (as most were). 

If any comfort is to be found in the Abacus poll, it comes from the fact that the support for fringe ideas

is higher among supporters of the People’s Party, those who self-identify on the right of the spectrum, those who have not received any COVID-19 shots, and those who think media and official government accounts of events can’t be trusted. Those who feel Pierre Poilievre is the Conservative leadership candidate closest to their values and ideas are more likely to believe these theories when compared to those who feel more aligned with Jean Charest.

You can see the full breakdown of that support here. 

While it is true that only a minority of Canadians hold beliefs or leanings that run counter to the goal of living in a rational and ordered society, the size of that minority is disturbing, and its implications a cause for concern, especially if the fracturing spreads. 

As Abraham Lincoln famously said, borrowing from the Bible, "A house divided from itself cannot stand."

Let's hope it never gets to that in Canada.

P.S. If you have the time and inclination, check out M.P. Charlie Angus's take on all of this.

  

 




8 comments:

  1. I personally have a great deal of suspicion of 'polls' no matter how framed for I believe that most 'moderates' simply hang up when contacted by pollsters (I know I do) and only those with strong feelings one way or another are more likely to respond …...
    I just hope there are many more quiet ones than outspoken ones and that in this case the 'squeaky wheel' does NOT get the attention!
    'Rural'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You make a very good point here, Rural, and I hope you are right about the respondents. I know that we rarely answer the phone if we don't recognize the number, and that is likely true for many. I read the methodology used in the poll, and from what I can discern, it consisted of people who have agreed to be surveyed periodically, and are allegedly representative of a wide demographic.

      Delete
  2. Let's hope that the polls overstate the minority. But I have encountered people in our community who buy the anti-vaxer baloney.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pandemic surely uncovered fault lines that we barely knew existed, Owen. It has been a disheartening experience for many.

      Delete
  3. Mein Gott! Muss das sein? How far do we have left before rock bottom? MoS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pessimist in me says we have a ways to go yet, Mound.

      Delete
  4. .. as usual, I often return to previous articles for 2nd or 3rd read
    Already this morning I’ve been rewarded via Twitter as well as by checking for updates at Progressive Bloggers. Norm Farrell has a post I didn’t get to yesterday.. quite remarkable how succinct he is. I tweeted a link as I often will. There’s some good hunting via Twitter this ayem.. as always there’s some astonishing fluff as well

    I’m not a huge Andrew Coyne fan.. but his thread re ‘pseudo - conservatives’ I found quite intriguing. I do argue that the term is useful, though perhaps misleading. It’s my believe that convenient labels or insults often miss the mark - fall short. My current view is we are seeing obvious ‘parasitic behaviour’ - parasitism in ‘politics’. Somehow I believed ‘politics’ was about Public Service.. not Self Serve.

    When we start looking at Poilievre - Candice Bergen - Jason Kenney - Doug Ford as akin to lamprey eels, warble fly or stomach worms.. yet we actually elect and reward these people ? Then what ? We tolerate - ie ‘learn to live with partisan parasites’ ? Say it ain’t so, Lorne .. !

    sal 🦎

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is an interesting article in today's Star about the poison that is spreading through our politics and fueling those who we are loathe to credit as having influence, sal.
      People like Poilievre et al. are clearly encouraging such poison. https://www.thestar.com/politics/political-opinion/2022/06/21/remember-when-threats-against-canadian-politicians-were-considered-a-joke.html

      Delete