Some voters might be insulted by Ford's low opinion of their worth; others will simply take the money and ask no questions, content with his explanation that it is to "stimulate the economy. Thie Star's Martin Regg Cohn is not among the latter group. He writes:
Ford’s PCs want an early election, no matter the cost. Never mind the unnecessary $155-million election expense — that’s the least of it.
If they settle on the $200 figure for every adult and child in Ontario, that works out to as much as $1,000 for a family of five — and perhaps $3.2 billion out of the treasury in total. That money is badly needed to shore up our schools, our hospitals and our homeless, but the premier believes he needs it more desperately to soften up voters.
That is a pretty high tab to be putting blinders on people's eyes, but blinders are what Ford needs, given his' situation'.
The headlines have faded, but few have forgotten the $8.28-billion imbroglio over protected land made available to private developers on the premier’s watch (until he reversed course under pressure). That police probe could be released sometime next year, delivering potentially bad news and a political death sentence.
Rather than wait for the police to rain on their re-election parade — scheduled for June 2026 under Ontario’s fixed election law — the plan is to move the campaign up by more than a year to early 2025.
Regg Cohn calls it for what it is:
It’s an elegant, if expensive, election plan: a kickback for voters, gifted by a government accused of kickbacks from developers (despite those opposition allegations in the legislature, no criminality has been proven and the police aren’t talking).
But lest we forget, Ford is an old hand at pandering to the public.
Ahead of the 2022 election, Ford’s Tories cut cheques to rebate motorists for licence plate fees that the government cancelled, at a cost of more than $1 billion to the treasury. During the COVID pandemic, parents received as much as $250 per child. And the previous PC government of Mike Harris issued $200 “dividend” cheques.
How to justify such shameless pre-election (early election) vote-buying?
The unspoken reason is to satisfy the premier’s lust for power. The official rationale is to support people’s purchasing power.
Regg Cohn ends his piece with this query: ... does he have voters figured out?
Only you can answer that question.
For the average Canadian that doesn't get deeper politically than a F**K JT sticker on their car and the same flag in their garage $200 is just about right to continue to be Komplict with the Ford Nation Kakistocracy. K-FNK kinda has a ring to it . And for that money . I remember the Ralph Klien oil money and I used the word complicit at that time and yes I spent the money (single parent etc.) but did realize then no matter how superior my reasoning and beliefs, I like all others, was a total participant in the rape of the earth and the 6th great extinction. We are funny monkeys
ReplyDeleteWe are all complicit, Anon, in our own ways. But the question really comes down to whether the money itself induces us to turn a blind eye to the pillaging of the commons to vote for the kakistocracy.
DeleteI would gladly take his bribe Lorne but for the fact that it it comes right out of OUR pockets in the first place, ahh well I will never take the tunnel under the 401 or park at the new taxpayer funded Ontario place so may as well take what I can get before the bills start coming in!
ReplyDeleteVisiting the Science Center would be nice but I guess that's out?
Well, election bribes do have their appeal, Anon, but as you say, we are dinging ourselves here.
Delete