In my previous post I wrote at some length about the buffoonery that defines the Doug Ford government here in Ontario; while I briefly return to that subject now, I shall also take a look at my disappointment over Jagmeet Singh's recent pronouncements. Just bear with me, if you are so inclined.
First, a peek at our Pavlovian premier, Mr. Ford. The previous government, under Kathleen Wynne, mandated charging plugs for all new house and condo builds in 2018. Mr. Ford, in 2019, stripped that provision out of the building code. Despite his heavily investing in EV battery plants for Ontario, he will not reverse that decision.
... after lobbying from developers who said the plugs added $500 to the cost of a new house, Ford stripped them from the code. He also ended rebates of up to $14,000 for buyers of EVs and scrapped chargers from GO Transit stations and other public locations.
Why, when EV investment is so important to the Ontario economy, would he continue to hang tough?
Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Paul Calandra, who tabled legislation modernizing the building code on Wednesday, warned that keeping new home costs low is more important than mandating EV chargers.
“Look, I think homeowners can make that decision on their own. If you’re wanting to buy a EV, we encourage you to do it — that’s why we’re making massive investments in that,” Calandra told reporters at Queen’s Park.
“But if that’s something that you want to do, then the homeowner themselves can undertake that. We want to keep costs of building new homes down,” he said.
The price of installing an EV charger in an existing home can be between $1,000 and $3,000 — much more than putting one in during construction.
Green Leader Mike Schreiner said the Tories “are ideologically opposed to building the infrastructure we need for electric vehicles” and that has economic consequences.
“Is Ford Motor Company delaying the building of their plant and retooling their plant in Oakville because they know we don’t have the infrastructure in Ontario to facilitate the adoption of electric vehicles?” said Schreiner.
I leave you to draw your own conclusions as to the 'soundness' of the government's 'thinking'.
Things are not much better on the federal scene. I must confess to my surprise and disappointment with NDP leader Jagment Singh, who now seems to be waffling on the carbon levy and thereby succumbing to the siren call of populism.
The federal New Democrats no longer believe a consumer carbon price is necessary to fight climate change, Jagmeet Singh suggested Thursday.
The new position, which appears to break with the NDP’s previous support for the policy, was outlined in a speech Singh delivered at the Broadbent Institute’s annual policy conference in Ottawa on Thursday. In it, he distanced his party from the federal Liberals’ flagship climate policy, which has drawn criticism from across the country as the levy and its accompanying rebates increased this April.
Singh condemned the approaches of both Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre to the climate crisis, and said tackling it “can’t be done by letting working families bear the cost of climate change while big polluters make bigger and bigger profits.”
Sadly, this move lends legitimacy to the prattle of PP and the provincial premiers, who seem to speak as one in denouncing the levy as a burden on all of us, despite the fact that most come out ahead with the feds' quarterly rebate checks.
I will give Singh credit for one assertion, however.
Referring to a March report that concluded industrial carbon pricing systems were far more effective than the consumer levy on fuel, Singh told reporters that the New Democrats “want more attention on the policies that are the biggest drivers of lowering emissions,” such as the industrial price on pollution and methane regulations.
Industrial carbon pricing systems would be a reference to such protocols as cap and trade. Yes, the very same system that Doug Ford dismantled when he came to power, a move that led to Trudeau imposing the carbon levy on all of us. Interestingly, even as Mr. Ford and others rail against the levy, no one seems to have any interest in bringing back cap and trade. Why not? You would have to ask Mr. Ford and his friends in high places for the answer.
I also don't have a direct answer as to why the electorate cannot make the journey from A to B and connect the dots that would show the arrant hypocrisy of people like Ford when they indulge in the political theatre of fed-bashing.
Hence my jaundiced view of humanity.
I don't believe it's an accident that Kakistocracies are popping up all over. If we were able to follow the money we would find that the world's billionaires and transnational CEOs are funding the march to authoritarianism.
ReplyDeleteIn Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid’s Tale' people fleeing the oppression came to Canada. I don't think that option will be open when the crunch comes.
Authoritarianism is very attractive to the mega-capitalists, Toby. It makes everything so much simpler for them. They certainly learned that under Hitler, with whom many of the most well-known corporate entities collaborated.
DeleteJust one comment on this Lorne, as a retired electrician I think mandating putting the infrastructure (i.e. the wiring out to the driveway) for future EV charger makes very good sense and would add very little to the cost of a new build. To mandate installing an actual a charger on all houses many of which may never be used at any time in the near future is indeed just helping push the cost out of reach to more buyers.
ReplyDeleteIt is unclear what was originally proposed, the numbers dont add up for me, perhaps someone can elucidate!
I agree, Rural. I think the reporting might be a bit inaccurate here. I suspect what existed in the original building code was the wiring, not the actual charger. I'll check this out further and report back on what I find.
DeleteThat appears to be the case, not only that but a great deal depends upon the max charge rate of the unit installed, see https://www.hellotech.com/blog/how-many-amps-for-ev-charger
ReplyDeleteThanks, Rural. I'm not an especially technical guy, but the article explained a great deal.
DeleteThat appears to be the case Lorne, not only that but it all depends upon the charge rate of the unit installed see https://www.hellotech.com/blog/how-many-amps-for-ev-charger
ReplyDelete@ Toby.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/jan/17/alabama-power-electric-utility-finance-birmingham-news
WTF?
TB
Thank you for the link, TB. I went through the article quickly, but when I have a bit more time I intend to click on several of the links contained therein. All I can say it that the behaviour described in the piece is nothing short of depraved. Human life means little to too many people and entities. All of which is yet another reminder of the critical importance of independent media.
DeleteThe Irving family in New Brunswick . . . "They own all five of the English language daily newspapers in the province, alongside 29 other publications, including 21 French and English weekly newspapers. These newspapers, while publicly registered, are limited in liability and privately held; the public knows little about their operations. The family also happen to own three radio stations, one of which is in Newfoundland."
ReplyDeletehttps://thestrand.ca/on-the-family-that-owns-new-brunswick/#:~:text=In%201944%2C%20the%20Irvings%20bought%20New%20Brunswick%20Publishing,remaining%20English%20language%20newspaper%20publishers%20in%20the%20province.
Hi Toby. Thanks for the link, and sorry about putting your comment up late. It just appeared in my mailbox today for some reason. Anytime there is a concentration of media, that is bad news (pun intended). Your link demonstrates that fact amply when it comes to the Irvings and New Brunswick.
Delete