Thursday, October 26, 2023

Not A Team Player

 


I have never been much of a joiner. I never really participated in team sports, committees (unless I had no choice), or group endeavours. There is something about the passionate intensity of such pursuits that has always left me cold. And, of course, history teaches us a great deal about happens when we lose ourselves in collective mania.

I therefore feel a measure of sympathy for Hamilton Centre MPP Sara Jama, the erstwhile NDP member ousted from caucus over her refusal to recognize and submit to the party hierarchy. It is not always easy to play nice with others. But my sympathy is limited.

There are many posts on social media decrying NDP leader Marit Stiles' decision to remove Jama. Some profess admiration for Jama's unwavering defence of Palestinians and vow never again to vote for the party. Indeed, someone went so far as to vandalize the window of Stiles' constituency office.

All, of course, are entitled to their opinion, but what they fail to understand in their idealistic fervour is that politics is a team sport. It is something one presumably knows before running for office. And it is a truth that Ms. Jama chose to ignore repeatedly.

Marit Stiles had this to say about her removal from caucus:

NDP Leader Marit Stiles announced Monday that Sarah Jama was removed from caucus because she has “broken the trust of her colleagues,” less than an hour before government MPPs passed a motion that will prevent Ms. Jama from speaking in the legislature.

 Ms. Jama, who was elected last March to the riding of Hamilton Centre, has been the source of controversy for the NDP after she posted a statement two weeks ago about the conflict in the Middle East. The post focused on the plight of Palestinians and human-rights violations in Gaza but did not speak about Israeli lives lost or condemn Hamas for its atrocities against Jewish people.

Ms. Stiles initially demanded that Ms. Jama remove the post, but the rookie MPP did not do so. Instead, Ms. Jama issued an apology to Jewish and Israeli people, condemned Hamas, and called for a release of all hostages and an end to the siege in Gaza. Ms. Jama’s original post, which she has since moved to the top of her social media, remains online. 

It would seem that Stiles worked earnestly to avoid removing her from caucus.

“Ms. Jama and I had reached an agreement to keep her in the NDP caucus, which included working together in good faith with no surprises. Our caucus and staff have made significant efforts to support her during an undoubtedly difficult time,” Ms. Stiles said in a statement.

“Since then, she has undertaken a number of unilateral actions that have undermined our collective work and broken the trust of her colleagues.”

Drilling right done to the essential truth, it is clear that Jama, in her own purist approach to politics, was undermining Stiles' very leadership of the Ontario NDP, as well as offering the gift to the Ford government of diversion from the Greenbelt scandal. These are two facts that the idealists among us fail to acknowledge.

Politics has been called "the art of the possible," a pragmatic perspective that, in my view, speaks another essential truth. By ignoring that truth, Jama has consigned herself to political oblivion and betrayed her obligations to her entire constituency.

 


8 comments:

  1. All of this has garnered Ms Jama a lot of attention, Lorne -- which, apparently, is what it's all about these days.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Some would say it is a Pyrrhic victory, Owen.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jamas whole point of view is based on very recent history..Awareness.that this conflict is 1400 years old eludes her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to admit that I really am not conversant with the entire history here, Anon. Could you provide us with some details?

      Delete
  4. I, personally, think ejecting Jama from caucus reflects very poorly on Styles and the NDP caucus but that is their right. What was the name of those cigarettes? Ah yes, Craven Ms.

    This horrifies me: “On Monday, the Doug Ford government voted in favour of a motion that not only acts as a formal disapproval of the Hamilton-Centre MPP’s statements, but also prevents the Speaker from recognizing her until a formal apology is made and the social media post is deleted.”

    This headline is should read “Conservative Gov't issues gag order on MPP”.

    Jama has done nothing to violate the rules or mores of the House. If she had, it is the job of the Speaker to impose sanctions.


    What Dougie and his gaggle have done is a direct attack on a Member of the Legislature to deprive a sitting MMP the right to do her job. This has also, disenfranchised the voters of Hamilton-Centre

    It is a direct attack attack on free speech both in what she posted and in the House.

    It is the responsibility of the Speaker to tell Dougie and crew to take a hike. They have no authority to say who can speak in the House.

    I am almost literally livid over this. I, certainly, am disgusted.

    If this abomination is upheld, who gets muzzled next?

    john

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree, john, that the censure was far out of line and, of course, a political ploy by the Conservatives to enhance their own standing amongst certain groups. It was political theatre writ large.

      I came across an interesting article by Andrew Philips today defending Stiles' action but condemning the governments over-the-top reaction. If you ave access to The Star, here is the link: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/censuring-sarah-jama-by-ford-government-goes-a-few-steps-too-far/article_ce690f46-d503-509a-8ebf-a93164c6304a.html

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the lnk. Surprisingly it was not pay-walled. It can be maddeningly difficult to subscribe to the Star.

      I cannot say I agree with all the writer's points but I wish he had hammered the Gov't. more for violating Jama's right to free speech and her rights as an MMP.

      I would like to know why the Speaker cannot squash this.

      Delete
    3. My understanding is that the Speaker has no obligation to recognize this censure. It is up to him as to whether he will recognize Jama, although her now sitting as an independent means her opportunities will be few.

      Delete