.jpg)
Further to that piece Friday on how Israel’s radical rightwing shift is brutalizing Israeli society, I stumbled across this:
http://forward.com/articles/202558/israeli-professor-suggests-rape-would-serve-as-ter/
And I found this insightful and well footnoted piece from The Nation on AlterNet debunking Israel’s (and our own) narrative on the Gaza invasion.
http://www.alternet.org/world/five-israeli-talking-points-gaza-debunked?akid=12060.103986._jtkpX&rd=1&src=newsletter1013185&t=5
When an Israeli, of all people, can openly call for a “final solution” to the Palestinian problem, well...
Netanyahu calls upon Palestinian civilians to “leave Gaza.” How exactly? And go where?
I have a solution to this unbearable mess. This would be a perfect opportunity for NATO to do something useful for a change instead of babysitting an unresolved civil war in Afghanistan or haplessly bombing Libya while al Qaeda snuck in the back door to spread through North Africa. What I have in mind is a 40-year peacekeeping mission along the lines of what we did successfully in Cyprus.
NATO forces re-establish the pre-67 borders between Israel and the Palestinians. Yes, that means the Israelis leaving the illegal settlements on the West Bank. Jerusalem is reconstituted as an “open city.” A buffer strip, extending at least five miles into the Palestinian and the Israeli side of the border is occupied by NATO personnel armed to the teeth and with the latest surveillance technology.
The Palestinians would be assisted to re-establish a functioning government and economy in the West Bank and Gaza. Israel’s blockade of the Palestinian coastline would be lifted. NATO naval forces would patrol Gaza’s coastal waters. NATO would also be responsible for securing the airspace over Palestinian territories and reopening air transport corridors into the West Bank and Gaza.
The idea would be to give the Palestinians their own homeland and statehood. Give them a viable, secure and peaceful place to again live and work freely, relieved of the yoke of generations of occupation. Allow them to rebuild their homes, their farms and their cities. Let them discover a way other than armed resistance.
Why 40 years? That’s roughly two-generations which I figure would be the minimum needed to breed the worst of the mutual hatred out of the Palestinians and Israelis. It would also allow both peoples and both governments to very gradually establish something approximating normal relations.
I’m convinced that extremism and violence are not traits inherent to any people and that, given the chance, we all would choose security, stability and peace, not only for ourselves but especially for our children.
Mos, The Disaffected Lib
It is interesting that Kedar tells us what would supposedly deter Hamas leaders from launching rockets but fails to tell us what would deter Israeli leaders from systematically stealing Palestinian lands.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, it is tragicomedy that his statements calls Israel a "liberal, law-abiding country."
Kirby, I think Israel aspired to be a liberal democracy at the outset but has instead become an illiberal democracy - a term that means a less than open society in which, although elections still take place, the public is kept in the dark and lacks true civil liberties. Illiberal democratic governments operate outside the law and often surrounded in great secrecy. There's a thin line between illiberal democracy and the form of neoliberalism that has taken hold even in Canada.
ReplyDelete