Sunday, August 23, 2026

Vassal Statehood Averted


A vassal state is a nation that, while often appearing to be independent, has its sovereignty and decision-making powers significantly constrained and dictated by a more powerful state. Its ability to act autonomously, particularly in areas like foreign policy, defense, or economic affairs, is limited to what the dominant power permits or grants.

I woke up yesterday morning with the news that the trade deal Canada had been negotiating with the U.S. was off. I was massively relieved, finally finding a peace of mind that had eluded me for days. Subsequently, I followed the media throughout the day.

Watching TV and reading online papers, it became clear that the Trump administration made last-minute demands that would have been complete folly to acquiesce in. The deal Canada was prepared to sign was bad enough.

As my previous post indicated I had a very bad feeling about the deal that was close to being signed. Apparently, it included all the things I had written about, with one inaccuracy. In yesterday's strong, statesman-like address,  Prime Minister Carney answered a large number of press questions, one of which led me to stand corrected: my assertion that the very bad deal they were about to sign gave the Americans almost exclusive access to our critical minerals. Taking Carney at his word, he said that wasn't true, that he would never have done for that.

So what saved us from that deal and led to this retaliatory trade war in which Canada can hold its head high? Apparently, Howard Lutnick suddenly appeared, making the demands that led to Canada walking out. We owe that malign influence a huge debt of gratitude, as Adam Radwanski writies:

[Lutnick] did Canada a service by reminding Mark Carney and his negotiators who they were dealing with — and saving us from a bad deal that probably would’ve only looked worse down the road.

The deal narrowly averted appears to have essentially ensconced in perpetuity tariffs on a myriad of our goods, Had it been signed, it would have been a slippery slope to the bottom.

Trump appeared to have successfully moved the goalposts with his threat of new 50 per cent tariffs on a range of products, leaving Canada so determined to avoid those that it was willing to live with less relief from his existing tariffs than it had previously demanded. Modest cuts to the levies on our automotive and steel exports, among others, would have locked in rates still too high for those industries to be viable in the long run.

Meanwhile, Canada would’ve had to give up what leverage it had, including both counter-tariffs and the provincial bans on U.S. booze that have gotten under Trump’s skin. Plus, we appeared poised to scrap Buy Canadian procurement policies, giving U.S. companies relatively unfettered access to government contracts here, even as Canadian access to the U.S. market remained restricted.

Apparently the pending deal was so bad that Ontario's Doug Ford called Carney on Wednesday urging him not to sign.

“I thought it was a terrible deal and I was very clear with the Prime Minister, once you make these deals they can last for years and years and go into decades.”

Campbell Clark provides additional details on what the foul triumvirate of Trump, Greer and Lutinick demanded at the last minute, clearly sensing Canada's weakness and therefore going for the kill. 

U.S. negotiators declared that the lower tariff rate on cars wouldn’t apply to Canadian trucks, he [Mr. Carney] said. They wanted language that would restrict Canada’s ability to strike new trade deals with other countries, he said. And they pushed for Canada to give up some protections for culture and the French language, he said, including labelling on products. 

That’s hardly the kind of package that Mr. Carney could sell back home. It would be insane to hand the trade bully more power to shake us down by allowing them to dictate the terms of Canada’s trade with other countries. It’s hard to imagine a more poisonous pill than making a deal with the U.S. that suggests the French language be taken off labels, especially when it is six weeks before a Quebec election.

Justin Ling says in the aftermath of this attempted  shakedown, things are much clearer for everyone.

We know now, with no ambiguity, that Trump does not want efficient supply chains, nor mutually beneficial co-operation.

Donald Trump believes he can fuel America’s economy by stealing his supposed allies’ industries. He is skulking around the parking lot, siphoning gas from empty cars. 

In walking away, we have preserved our ability to fight back and go elsewhere.

Even though there will be a hard economic toll from these tariffs and counter-tariffs, I believe Canada is in a much stronger position than it was on Friday. We have finally established that despite the series of unrequited concessions we gave up to this point, we have reached the breaking point, and, as Carney put it, anything the Americans sign is written in pencil.  

Oh, and one other thing. As the Prime Minister pointed out, 

“Canada fuels American growth, supplying 99 percent of their natural gas imports, 85 percent of their electricity imports, 60 percent of their crude oil imports,” Carney said. “I don’t think they want us to stop sending any of that energy.”

Not a bad trump card to keep in one's pocket, eh? 

 

 

8 comments:

  1. If memory serves, our first PM, John A. Macdonald, said that free trade with the United States was the stupidest thing he heard of. That's why he supported the building of a trans-continental railway.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Methinks there was much wisdom there, Toby. Let's hope it guides us toward a future in which Canada can continue to be proud.

      Delete
  2. I think there is some aphorism about not fighting a two–front war.

    So far, the USA is heavily committed in shooting wars with Russia and Iran, looks to be restarting a new and potentially nasty trade war with China, the world's largest economy (PPP), and is starting/continuing a trade war with its largest trade partner.

    I wonder what the Mexican Gov't is thinking at the moment? President Sheinbaum and her advisors may be recalibrating their negotiation points a bit just now. My impression has been that they have been fighting a bit of a rear guard action recently. Canada's stance may have surprised them.

    Oh, and the recent enforcement of China's law making it illegal to comply with US secondary sanctions may have an interesting effect. China’s Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law: First judicial confirmation of mandatory application in cross-border shipping dispute

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. All very good observations here, Anon. If the American public accessed real news, as opposed to the propaganda by Fox and others, one wonders what their reaction to all of this madness would be. One also wonders (and hopes) about the ramifications of Canada standing up to the American behemoth. Will it change the perspective and approach of other countries perpetually in the crosshairs of the American hegemon? Time will provide the answer, I guess.

      Delete
    2. "Will it change the perspective and approach of other countries perpetually in the crosshairs of the American hegemon?"

      Well,' I think it might in Mexico's case. I just wish I knew if Canada and Mexico are in close contact if not co-operating.

      Still judging from the reception of Carney's speech at the WEF and the USA's crushing military defeat at the hands of Iran, a lot of countries may be reassessing things.

      Come to think of it, Brazil, who is not happy with the USA, seems to be expanding its relations with fellow BRICS member including a Defense Cooperation Agreement whatever that entails.

      I suspect we will be under a microscope for a while while other middle powers observe. I get the feeling that South Korea may be getting annoyed and may be pondering new trade relations. I wonder maybe BRICS? Seems too drastic but US power is slipping rapidly outside the Western Hemisphere and may not be doing that well there.

      Delete
    3. I agree with your points, Anon. I did hear that just recently Canada had spoken to Mexico, but I don't know any details. The Americans have deeply offended most of the world and is vulnerable, so I suspect that Trump will try to bring down an even bigger hammer against Canada in an attempt to keep the others in line. Will it work? It would be nice if the contempt countries feel for the U.S. under Trump could form some kind of collective trade action and stop knuckling under, but that is probably an unrealistic hope.

      The Americans have only themselves to blame for any consequences that arise from their commercial belligerence.

      Delete
  3. Just after my rely I found this.
    https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202608/1368853.shtml

    Maybe we should apply to join BRICS. We may have annoyed Trump enough that a bit more is not worth worrying about. Anyway Canada's actions may help our relations with the PRC.

    It might be a bit too much to propose an alliance with Russia but, OTOH, if we did, our two countries would control probably 80 or 90% of the Arctic coastline. There are only five countries with Arctic coastline, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Russia, USA.

    Global Times is basically the CPC/Gov't paper in China though I don't know if it is so officially.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A very interesting read. Thanks for the link. It is interesting, isn't it, that the extremism of the U.S. makes even Chinese propaganda pieces seem reasonable? All part of the waning influence the U.S. exerts in the world, I suppose.

      Delete