Reflections, Observations, and Analyses Pertaining to the Canadian Political Scene
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Sammy Yatim Killing: Once More, The Globe And Mail Is Out Of Step
Thanks to a tweet from Dr.Dawg, I became aware of an odious, but ultimately not very surprising editorial from The Globe and Mail on the shooting of Sammy Yatim. I have written numerous times of how I view the paper as the organ of the establishment and the status quo, as well as why I cancelled my subscription some years ago.
Today's editorial confirms that the decline of the paper is proceeding apace under the sychophantic stewardship of Editor-in-Chief John Stackhouse, a man who abandoned any semblance of journalistic integrity when he failed to fire Margaret Wente for her serial plagiarism.
The editorial essentially says let's all calm down, police have to make split-second decsions, police don't usually fire just one shot because the chances of hitting the 'target' are only about 25%.
Perhaps the following excerpts best catch the flavour and bias of the piece. The bolded parts are mine:
The videos show that the officer fired nine shots toward 18-year-old Sammy Yatim, as the teenager, who had ignored repeated commands to drop a knife he was holding, began moving toward the front steps out of the streetcar. Two officers had their firearms aimed into the streetcar; one fired three shots, there was a pause, and then six more shots were heard.
...But the public should not overreact to the images seen on the Internet before all the facts are known.
Perhaps these on-line commentators say it best as they express their disdain for the Globe's propagandistic piece:
Tom Philip, 9:09 PM on July 29, 2013:
I have been considering cancelling my subscription to The Globe and Mail for some time, chiefly because of the dramatic decline in quality in recent years. This editorial has made the decision for me. The slaying of Sammy Yatim -- no threat to anyone, confined as he was on a streetcar in what amounted to a jail cell on wheels -- was as brutal, callous and ugly a crime as I can recall. Did it not cross the minds of the dozens of police officers as they aimed their 9mm automatic pistols at this boy with a knife that here was someone's child, someone with a father and a mother, sisters and brothers, a young man with his life ahead of him and every right to live that life? In the moments before he so casually gunned his victim down, did it not occur to the officer who fired the fatal shots to display some simple humanity? Spare me the tired bromide about police having to make split-second decisions. The police in this instance had all the time in the world to de-escalate the situation, but without even taking the time to think, opted instead to end it with an overwhelming display of lethal violence. Spare me, as well, the nonsense about allowing the SIU, as gutless and toothless a body as ever existed in this province, to complete its investigation. The proper venue for this case is a court of law, with the evidence presented in public and the officers involved judged by a jury composed of the citizens of Toronto. That is what this editorial ought to be calling for, and what it would have called for before The Globe and Mail and most of the rest of the media in this country became a mealy-mouthed lapdog to power and authority. Sammy Yatim could have been any one of us. He could have been your child or mine. Until justice is done and seen to be done, his death will be a stain on this city and on everyone who wears the uniform of the Toronto Police Service. That's my name up there, by the way. No Internet anonymity for me. Now I'm going upstairs to call the Globe's circulation department. I won't have this rubbish in my home one more day.
And this from KevinBrown2011:
9:18 PM on July 29, 2013
What moron wrote this editorial?
So we should not form any opinion on what is clearly shown in the video until the SIU issues its findings?
The writer tries to justify the number of shots fired when clearly NO shots should have been fired. Also it is obvious that the first 3 shots felled the victim as the officer changed his trajectory and fired 6 more shots while the victim was on the floor. There was no need to fire at the victim when he was injured on the floor the street car. And after filling the young man with lead an officer jumps in and tasers him?
How could anyone believe that the actions of the cops were reasonable and justified?
How, indeed.
We have cancelled our subscription to the Globe and switched to Toronto Star. We have never been happier even though there is no home delivery here in Ottawa. Ali
ReplyDeleteI applaud your decision, Ali. we did exactly the same thing about three years ago.
DeleteLorne, I got home tonight to read an item in the National Post that had security camera stills that showed Mr. Yatim slumped to his knees from the first shot and apparently remained there while the murderous swine fired another eight rounds into him.
ReplyDeleteThere's nothing defensive about that. It's an execution.
'Execution' is the word that best describes what happened, Mound. In fact, it is the term used by a retired OPP officer in a Star letter I will include in my next post.
Delete