I was going to write about something else today, but now that Trump has had his predictable tantrum over the above ad, perhaps this will serve as a wakeup call to Mark Carney and his government that any hope of securing a stable, long lasting trade agreement with the U.S. is but a sad delusion.
Trump had this to say:
U.S. President Donald Trump says he is terminating all trade negotiations with Canada over an advertisement by the Ontario government that uses the late U.S. president Ronald Reagan's own words to send an anti-tariff message to American audiences.
In a late-night post to his Truth Social platform, Trump attacked the ad, which he attributed to Canada rather than Ontario, as fraudulent and fake.
"TARIFFS ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY, AND ECONOMY, OF THE U.S.A." Trump wrote. "Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED."
In a later post on Friday morning, Trump claimed “CANADA CHEATED AND GOT CAUGHT!!!"
"They fraudulently took a big buy ad saying that Ronald Reagan did not like Tariffs, when actually he LOVED TARIFFS FOR OUR COUNTRY, AND ITS NATIONAL SECURITY,” he wrote. “Canada has long cheated on Tariffs, charging our farmers as much as 400 [per cent]. Now they, and other countries, can’t take advantage of the U.S. any longer."
Clearly, the time is drawing very near when we have to assert both our trade independence and sovereignty, as the mad king will not stop until he has crushed both. Appeasement attempts have been an abject failure, and we need to assert the leverage we have: energy and rare earth minerals come readily to mind.
The only bright spot that has emerged thus far, marking a departure from our usual supine reaction to the U.S., is the fact that there are going to be tangible penalties for both Stellantis and GM over their ceasing production at two plants in Ontario.
As CBC News first reported, the two multinational manufacturers will no longer be exempt from paying Canada’s retaliatory tariffs on as many U.S.-assembled vehicles as before.
The move is an attempt to put pressure on the companies to reinvest in Canadian production and workers to get this benefit back and avoid a big tariff bill.
"This action follows the automakers' unacceptable decision to scale back their manufacturing presences in Canada, directly breaching their commitments to the country and Canadian workers," the government said in a late-night media release.
And those penalties will be consequential.
The ministers announced that effective immediately, the government is lowering the amount of American-assembled vehicles GM can import tariff-free by 24 per cent and cutting Stellantis's amount by 50 per cent.
"I think Canadians and the industry want the government to be tough on companies that don't own up to those partnerships that in many cases have been worth billions," said Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association.
"This is a great move."
While these tariffs will raise the Canadian price of GM and Stellantis vehicles, the obvious answer, and likely intent of the penalties, is for consumers to avoid buying their products. Since Canada represents a very important market for American cars, this move will hurt their profits considerably.
Perhaps we are finally deciding that we will no longer give our lunch money to the bully.
My question is how do you have a rational conversation with a 5 year old having a temper tantrum who is wrecking his room?
ReplyDeleteClearly, Rural, you can't. The sooner our government understands this, the sooner we can move on and not waste any more time on this idiot.
DeleteI tend to be of two minds about that ad. It may have kick started something useful in Canada's response or it may have wreaked a carefully thought-out Federal strategy.
ReplyDeleteThe Federal Gov't has been desperately trying to cozy up to China after the Trudeau Gov't's incredibly stupid moves over Meng Wanzhou (who, BTW, apparently owned two "modest" mansions in Vancouver and had spent a lot of time there, kids went to schooll there, hubby worked on a Masters there) and then the blindingly stupid 100% tariff on electric vehicles.*
It may well have been Carney has been stalling until we have a peace-treaty with China and Ford messed up the timing. On the other hand, I suppose it could be a Carney-Ford initiative to free up Carney's hands.
I still feel that Carney needs to give Ford and Smith slaps alongside the head an explain to them in words of one syllable, that international affairs are a Federal responsibility. If they want to deal with the US Gov't they can do it as part of a Federal delegation.
* I keep saying that Justin did a decent job under some nasty circumstances internally but was an absolute idiot in the international realm.
I understand your objections, Anon, but for me and many others, the ad was a balm to a battered spirit. With nothing to show thus far in trade talks with Trump, there is a real pleasure in seeing the beast enraged. My own thought is that it's always going to be one thing or another that enrages the mad king, so finding an outlet for Canadian frustrations is a good thing. And interestingly, Marco Rubio stated that the negotiations with Canada are terminated "for now".
DeleteTotally off-topic but something I tripped over yesterday.
ReplyDeleteI have never had any faith in Trump's desire to have any kid of a permanent peace settlement in the Israel–Palestine mess. He, clearly has been pro-Israel at least since his first term. Moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem and declaring as US policy that the Golan Heights were Israeli tended to show this.
Sheldon Adelson only gave him US$25 million in his first presidential campaign and a measly US$5 million for his inauguration but politicians often are available at relatively low cost. Then for his next campaign, Miriam Adelson tossed in US$100 million. I guess she thought the initial $25 million had been such a good investment it was worth upping the amount.
Trump's choice of ambassador to Israel has been the craziest, most fanatical Christian Zionist pastor he could find in Mike Huckabee the man with true ambasadorial neutrality always refegs to the West Bank as Judea and Samaria.
Then we have his chosen negotiators. Steve Witkoff is a New York real estate lawyer turned developer with no diplomatic experience. His sole qualification seems to be that he is a friend of Donald Trump. I note that he is Jewish but I have not seen anything about his support or otherwise for Israel.
Jared Kushner, on the other hand, has been reported to be the member of an orthodox Jewish family which has long financed projects in Israel and whose family have counted Benjamin Netinuhu as a close friend and house guest.
Maybe I am being a bit cynical but having Witkoff and Kushner as the major mediators in the Gaza peace-fire talks would not give me warm feelings if I were a member of HAMAS or, for that matter, anyone concerned with the Gazans, or Palestinians in general, well being.
After all that ranting and raving here is an interesting clip of Kushner and Witkoff on 60 Minutes
Watch Jared Kushner’s face when this goofball blurts out the fact they were planning on rebuilding Gaza into prime beachfront property BEFORE the October 7th attacks.
Witkoff
A master plan Jared’s been working on for 2 years
If you remember, the Oct- 07 attack occurred 2 years and 18 days from today (2025-01-25)
The look on Kushner's face is quite revealing, Anon. I think when all is said and done, the people Trump has surrounded himself with do not have the people's interests at heart. As for winning over Hamas, I have long suspected that we are dealing with political theatre more than anything else. If you look back since the Hamas attack, every time there was talk of a ceasefire, Israel struck Gaza repeatedly; if they were interested in peace, they would have chosen a different tact. I agree that the whole peace plan that was hammered out is not one that inspires any degree of confidence.
DeleteIIRC, Hamas was not at the peace conference. Not a good beginning.
DeleteIf I were Hamas, disarming would look like suicide. All one has to do is watch the original International Court of Justice hearing to see that Israeli politicians were advocating genocide.
Also, all too often people seem to forget Hamas won the last Palestinian election and should be considered the legitimate government of Palestine.
So far, I am counting this cease-fire as an Israeli defeat but not a Hamas victory except for the release of the Palestinian political prisoners/ victims.
All the more reason to expect little from this 'agreement,' Anon.
Delete